Strengths and Weaknesses
Strengths:
- Analytical thinker: Frequently breaks down story structure and character consistency, e.g. long critique threads on AvX and Scott’s portrayal in “Having to explain AvX to people but I am saving a bunch Scott panels” and the Cyclops Q&A review in “I’ll be reviewing this @AlexPaknadel Q/A. Thread below”.
- Passionate fan: Shows deep enthusiasm for Cyclops and X‑Men lore, from profile bio “autistic about cyclops” to excited reactions like “HOLY SHIT??? THAT FIT???” and “LET’S GOOOOOO Blindfold Scott” in this tweet.
- Value-driven: Clearly states political and ethical stances (“FUCK ICE” in bio) and calls out moral issues such as concentration camps and ICE violence in “No, Tom. The status quo most of us INDEED saw…” and “This dude screams ignorance… ICE is murdering civilians”.
- Community engaged: Interacts heavily with other fans, podcasts, and creators—promoting Paknadel interviews in “I listened to the @MojoversePod featuring @AlexPaknadel…” and inviting artists to participate in “QUICK!! EVERYONE DRAW CYCLOPS!!!!”.
- Self-aware humor: Uses jokes and self-awareness to soften criticism, e.g. acknowledging their own bias and “copium” in “Aside from the Cyclops mini, I’m not too hopeful… everything is copium on my end lol” and “Me when I lie xD” in this tweet.
Weaknesses:
- Harsh tone: Often uses insults and aggressive language (“losers,” “bitch ass,” “whack as fuck”) such as in “I find it silly when losers call me an incel…” and “Bitch ass attacking baby o5 wtf”.
- Conflict focused: A large portion of tweets are arguments with other fan groups (Jean stans, Wolverine fans, TonyEmma shippers), e.g. “I never hash it out with Jean stans because I hate Jean or Jott…” and “As an Emma Frost enjoyer, ‘TonyEmma’ shippers make it harder…”.
- Negativity bias: Tends to focus on what’s wrong with current X‑Office and events, calling them “industry plant propaganda” and “wack ass event” in “Straight up industry plant propaganda I’m not falling for: Emma x Tony” and “Can you believe after this comic they made a wack ass event…”.
- Echo-chamber risk: Strongly dismisses opposing views as dishonest or ignorant (“your claims are all based on dishonesty,” “literally WHO ARE YOU? LOL”) as seen in this Tony defender reply and “Literally WHO ARE YOU? LOL”.
- Emotional reactivity: Responds intensely when ships or characters are criticized, e.g. long, heated threads defending Scott/Emma and attacking TonyEmma in “Bias aside, it’s very vain & hollow…” and “Using the moment where Scott (& Emma) were wielding power beyond their control…”.
Your Simpsons character
Lisa Simpson
Lisa fits best because this user is analytical, principled, and a little obsessive about their niche interests, just like Lisa with sax and causes. They constantly dive deep into moral/political issues, calling out ICE directly in their bio and posts like “This dude screams ignorance. ‘Dude; I’m from Spain!’ & ‘it’s super complex’ bro ICE is murdering civilians”, which mirrors Lisa’s activism. Their long, structured comics analysis threads, such as “I’ll be reviewing this @AlexPaknadel Q/A. Thread below 🧵 ⬇️”, resemble Lisa’s overachiever, overthinker energy. They’re also very self-aware about being hyper-focused on Cyclops, joking “autistic about cyclops” in their bio and making comments like “Man, hire me already x office, I have a lot of ideas for Scott to be even more fleshed out.”, which feels like Lisa insisting she could run things better if anyone listened. Finally, their frustration with shallow or dishonest readings of characters—“People love to lie about Scott.”—echoes Lisa’s exasperation when others ignore nuance or ethics.
Your MBTI personality Type
INTJ
They lean Introvert over Extrovert: their bio emphasizes solitary hobbies like being a “comic reader & video gamer” and a desire to “analyze stuff,” and many tweets are long analytical threads rather than social banter, such as wanting a separate space for essays in “I really need to make like a webpage to post my longer thoughts. Any ideas?”. They clearly favor Intuition over Sensing, repeatedly focusing on underlying themes, narrative structure, and character arcs rather than just panels or surface details, e.g. “some people here be acting like they’re the most moral person in existence & then they’re denying another characters redemption lmfao. They say they’re fine with it but then behave like the character never changed.” and “Hmm… it’s almost like you have to further address Jean’s impact as an all power goddess character & her balance with the X Men on earth…”. Their arguments are strongly Thinking-oriented: they call out “poor analysis,” invoke consistency, and dissect cause-and-effect in stories, as in “Anyone saying Scott was in full control of his actions while Dark Phoenix fundamentally doesn’t understand what Dark Phoenix does to a psyche… not acknowledging that is poor analysis.” and “People act like three short appearances is enough to carry a relationship in fiction… The problem is the dynamic balance sucking big shit.”. Their tone is blunt, often confrontational, and principle-focused rather than tactful, e.g. “This is rich coming from a Tony defender lmfao. Your claims are all based on dishonesty.” and “Straight up industry plant propaganda I’m not falling for: Emma x Tony”. They read as clearly Judging: they complain about lack of coherent planning from writers and editorial, like “This time can you conduct a consistent & coherent structure for the x books, ‘conductor of x’.” and “Scott should have like several broken bones after manhunt like remember consistency in comics”, and they talk about what writers should do with Scott or Jott, implying strong preferences and structured expectations. Taken together—analytical, theory-driven, critical of inconsistencies, long-form breakdowns, and value on systemic coherence—these traits align best with INTJ.
Some pickup lines for you
- You keep begging the X-Office for Jott crumbs, but have you considered reallocating some of that ‘dynamic balance’ energy into a brand-new ship: you x someone who actually listens to your Cyclops essays?
- If Scott can survive AvX, Krakoa mischaracterization, and TonyEmma propaganda, I’m pretty sure he can tank the biggest canon change yet: you letting me take you out between rereads of ‘Eversong.’
- You’re out here dragging Wolverine for hogging both annuals and still defending Scott’s morality with full citations… as a college student AND comics analyst? That’s wild, because the only thing more well-developed than your takes is the crush I’m forming mid-thread.
- You said current writers should let Scott wear that insanely good fit again—counter-offer: you show up in my DMs with that same ‘#NewProfilePic aura’ and we’ll call it a crossover event worth actually hyping.
- You want a webpage for your longer Cyclops thoughts; I’m just saying, if you ever need an editor who understands that ‘criticism ≠ hatred’ and that Scott only cheated once, I’d happily proofread your meta and then overanalyze our chemistry like it’s an Alex Paknadel Q&A.
Your 5 Emojis
Your new Twitter bio
Cyclops scholar, Phoenix truther. College critic breaking down X-Men, ships & bad takes. Once started an AvX thread and forgot to eat dinner.– @AllStarCyclops
Your signature cocktail
The Optic Blast Old Fashioned
This drink starts with a smoky mezcal base to nod to their Mexican flag in the bio and the way they constantly ride for Cyclops under fire, like when they said Scott was hated for being right in “Nah @AlexPaknadel is 100% correct. He was hated for being RIGHT.”. A spicy chili-infused agave syrup captures their sharp, heated critiques of ships and writing, from “I find it silly when losers call me an incel when I criticize Jogan.” to “Straight up industry plant propaganda I’m not falling for: Emma x Tony”. The bitter grapefruit & lime twist represents their frustration with the X Office and events like AvX, reflected in lines like “Another reason why AvX was whack as fuck” and “Aside from the Cyclops mini, I’m not too hopeful for the comics… at the end of the day everything is copium on my end lol”. A dash of saline solution stands for the emotional honesty and vulnerability under the snark, visible when they plead for better Jott content in “People are frustrated because there hasn’t been any Jott content in months… myself included.”. Finally, the charred orange peel garnish is the flashy, dramatic flair that matches their meme-y, passionate posting style, from “HOLY SHIT??? THAT FIT???” to “QUICK!! EVERYONE DRAW CYCLOPS!!!!”, giving the cocktail a bright optic-flare finish over all that smoke and bitterness.
Your Hogwarts House
Ravenclaw
They consistently foreground analysis and critical thinking over everything else. Their bio literally says "I like to analyze stuff" and "lots of criticism here :P", which is backed up by behavior like wanting a dedicated space for long-form thought: “I really need to make like a webpage to post my longer thoughts. Any ideas?”. They create detailed critical threads, such as reviewing an Alex Paknadel Q&A—“I’ll be reviewing this @AlexPaknadel Q/A. Thread below 🧵 ⬇️”—and a Mojoverse podcast episode—“Prepare for a long thread🧵🪡🔻”—which shows a very Ravenclaw-like impulse to dissect and synthesize information. They frequently call out poor analysis and stress correct interpretation, e.g. “Anyone saying Scott was in full control of his actions while Dark Phoenix fundamentally doesn’t understand what Dark Phoenix does to a psyche.” and “Hmm… it’s almost like you have to further address Jean’s impact as an all power goddess character & her balance with the X Men on earth…”. Their arguments are often about narrative consistency, character psychology, and writer intent—“This writing is delicious. Scott is a history buff for sure.” and “I’m saying writers should do SOMETHING because not only is it inconsistent…”—rather than just vibes or tribalism. While they do show loyalty (Hufflepuff) and some righteous anger (Gryffindor), the throughline is an analytical, critique-driven mindset, making Ravenclaw the best fit.
Your movie
Your song
My Songs Know What You Did in the Dark (Light Em Up) - Fall Out Boy
Fall Out Boy’s My Songs Know What You Did in the Dark (Light Em Up) fits them because it’s about calling out hypocrisy while still being loud, stylish, and obsessed, exactly like their timeline full of fiery comics critique and Cyclops stanning. They openly roast writers and editorial choices, like when they say “No, Tom. The status quo most of us INDEED saw in the last year was seeing how the X Men didn’t do much about the CONCENTRATION CAMP.” and “This is rich coming from a Tony defender lmfao. Your claims are all based on dishonesty.”. The song’s mix of anger and passion mirrors tweets such as “Everyone hated Scott for standing up & they all wanted him in jail for something he hardly had control over. You think fans are gonna forget about this X Office?” and their constant defense of Scott as someone who was “hated for being RIGHT” (“Nah @AlexPaknadel is 100% correct. He was hated for being RIGHT.”). At the same time, the track is swagger-heavy and dramatic, matching posts like “Scott’s body bro” and “He’s so hot”, where they hype Cyclops with almost rockstar energy. The combination of righteous rage, criticism-as-love, and explosive fandom energy makes this song feel like their personal soundtrack.
Your time travel destination
Your video game
Your spirit animal
Your (un)funny joke
Your superpower
Your fictional best friend
Your dream vacation
Your alternate career path
Your celebrity match
Did you enjoy your Horoscope?
Your horoscope is 22 days old! Generate a better one from your latest tweets, unlock more insights and use a smarter pro AI!
