Strengths and Weaknesses
Strengths:
- Boundary-setting: They openly endorse blocking to protect their experience, e.g. calling replies a “free blocklist” in “Free blocklist in the replies for y'all :P” and advising to block 99.99% of hostile accounts in “You can safely block 99.99% of the accounts in the replies.”
- Pattern-recognition: They notice recurring behavior in replies and frame them as blocklists, as seen in repeated comments like “free blocklist in the replies thanks for making my job easier you bums” and “free blocklist in the replies holy moly”
- Data-minded: They reference quantitative observations about replies, citing percentages of positive, negative, and neutral responses in “Based on an expanded sample of 200 replies, positives are still low at ~15%, with negatives around 65% and the rest neutral.”
- Directness: They communicate bluntly and clearly, for example mocking over-sensitivity in “Reply and block 🤣🤣🤣. Y all are so sensitive.” and telling others to “take the L” in “Oh no I got blocked for exposing hypocrisy womp fucking womp, take the L”
- Community-curation: They treat replies as a tool for others to manage feeds, offering lists of accounts to block and saying “perfect time to hit the block button and drop receipts so you can judge for yourself” in “Never understood why outsiders always gotta be the loudest 🙄 Anyway, perfect time to hit the block button and drop receipts so you can judge for yourself and act accordingly.”
Weaknesses:
- Hostile-tone: They use derisive language like “you bums” in “free blocklist in the replies thanks for making my job easier you bums” and “get a life” in “holy shit get a life and do something better with your time”
- Dismissive-attitude: They frame large groups as disposable blocklists, e.g. “go through and block all of them” in “incredible blocklist in the replies: pagans who hate christ communists who hate hitler go through and block all of them please enjoy!”, reducing people to targets to block rather than engage
- Echo-chambering: Their heavy emphasis on mass blocking and curated blocklists, like “we periodically block blue ticks that reply… and block everyone” in “Due to this site being completely overrun with bots… we also post posts like this going 'if you reply to this you will be blocked' and block everyone.”, risks shutting out dissenting perspectives
- Provocative-framing: They highlight inflammatory labels (e.g., “pagans who hate christ communists who hate hitler” in “incredible blocklist in the replies: pagans who hate christ communists who hate hitler go through and block all of them”) in a way that stokes division rather than clarification
- Conflict-reliance: A large share of their content centers on blocking, hypocrisy, and defamation, such as “Blocking is the default response when you have no support for your bullshit defamatory statements.” and “Oh no I got blocked for exposing hypocrisy womp fucking womp, take the L”, suggesting they are drawn to or sustained by ongoing disputes
Your Simpsons character
Comic Book Guy
This user most closely resembles Comic Book Guy: opinionated, hyper-online, and constantly curating who is allowed in his space. They treat blocking like a hobby and public service, as seen in posts like “Free blocklist in the replies for y'all :P” and “free blocklist in the replies thanks for making my job easier you bums”, which mirrors Comic Book Guy’s habit of gatekeeping who counts as a "real" fan. Their tone is snarky and dismissive toward people they dislike, such as “Reply and block 🤣🤣🤣. Y all are so sensitive.” and “Oh no I got blocked for exposing hypocrisy womp fucking womp, take the L”, very much in line with his sarcastic put-downs. At the same time, they see blocking as a rational curation tool, echoing “If you actually read your replies, you don’t want that shit polluted... Blocking to me is how I check my garden for cut worms and other parasites.” and “You can safely block 99.99% of the accounts in the replies.”, which fits Comic Book Guy’s obsessive control over his environment. Their mix of data-ish commentary—like analyzing reply sentiment in “Based on an expanded sample of 200 replies, positives are still low at ~15%, with negatives around 65%...”—and contempt for "outsiders" (“Never understood why outsiders always gotta be the loudest 🙄 Anyway, perfect time to hit the block button...”) further reinforces the comparison to Springfield’s most pedantic and elitist nerd.
Your MBTI personality Type
INTJ
They lean Introvert (I): their focus is not on sharing personal life or social events but on curating their environment and replies, e.g., talking about mass blocking and viewing replies as a 'blocklist' rather than seeking social engagement, as in “There are 77 replies on this post, of which I can only see 7 because of the mass blocking I did earlier this year, holy shit get a life and do something better with your time”. They show strong Intuition (N) by treating blocks and replies as systems to analyze and optimize, like using threads and blocklists to shape information flow rather than focusing on concrete day-to-day details, for example “Read this thread. I discovered the same thing when I decided to using blocking as a filter. It made it a lot easier to get a wider perspective.” and “If you actually read your replies, you don’t want that shit polluted. You want good comments + when you aren’t in there, elevated discourse. Blocking to me is how I check my garden for cut worms and other parasites.”. Their tone is clearly Thinking (T): they emphasize evidence, statistics, and a detached view over harmony, as in “It's true that blocking can filter out criticism, creating a skewed view. Based on an expanded sample of 200 replies, positives are still low at ~15%, with negatives around 65% and the rest neutral. Reality check for all!” and the blunt dismissal in “Oh no I got blocked for exposing hypocrisy womp fucking womp, take the L”. They lean Judging (J) because they favor structure, boundaries, and proactive control: they repeatedly endorse preemptive blocking as a strategic, almost routine practice, e.g. “You can safely block 99.99% of the accounts in the replies. Save yourself having to deal with them later.” and “Never understood why outsiders always gotta be the loudest 🙄 Anyway, perfect time to hit the block button and drop receipts so you can judge for yourself and act accordingly.”. Overall, the mix of system-level thinking about information flow, emotional detachment, and deliberate boundary-setting best fits INTJ rather than a more people-focused F type or a spontaneous P type.
Some pickup lines for you
- So, if replies are just a ‘free blocklist’ to you, does that mean I have to flirt hard enough to get whitelisted instead?
- You said you can safely block 99.99% of the accounts in the replies—statistically speaking, I like my chances of being that 0.01%.
- The way you curate your timeline with mass blocks like a garden for ‘cut worms and parasites’… if you let me stay, I promise to be premium fertilizer, not a pest.
- You got blocked for ‘exposing hypocrisy’ and just hit them with a ‘womp fucking womp’—I’m just saying, if you ever want someone to hype you up in those quote tweets, I volunteer as tribute.
- You’ve turned ‘free blocklist in the replies’ into an art form; how about, for once, we make a thread that’s just you and me, zero blocklists, 100% chemistry?
Your 5 Emojis
Your new Twitter bio
Once blocked 90% of a thread and my timeline got smarter overnight. Curating replies like a pro, one ‘free blocklist’ at a time.– @blocktuah
Your signature cocktail
The Free Blocklist Bitter
This cocktail is strong and unapologetic, just like someone who says “You can safely block 99.99% of the accounts in the replies” and treats blocking like routine hygiene. The overproof rye is the assertive backbone, echoing the energy of posts like “Free blocklist in the replies for y'all :P” and “free blocklist in the replies thanks for making my job easier you bums”. Italian amaro brings a complex bitterness that matches the sardonic tone of “Oh no I got blocked for exposing hypocrisy womp fucking womp, take the L”. Grapefruit juice adds a sharp, citrus snap, keeping it refreshing while nodding to the analytical side that cites reply stats in “Based on an expanded sample of 200 replies, positives are still low at ~15%, with negatives around 65%”. The chili heat channels the gleeful pettiness of “Reply and block 🤣🤣🤣. Y all are so sensitive.”, and the charcoal salt rim symbolizes the curated, barrier-like timeline born from mass-blocking, as in “There are 77 replies on this post, of which I can only see 7 because of the mass blocking I did earlier this year”.
Your Hogwarts House
Slytherin
This user shows strong Slytherin traits of strategic self-preservation and deliberate curation of their environment, especially through aggressive use of blocking. They treat replies as a ‘blocklist’ resource, for example calling it a “Free blocklist in the replies for y'all :P” and again praising an “incredible blocklist in the replies… go through and block all of them please enjoy!”, which reflects a tactical approach to social interactions. Their endorsement of mass blocking as a proactive defense — e.g. “You can safely block 99.99% of the accounts in the replies. Save yourself having to deal with them later” quoted here: “You can safely block 99.99% of the accounts in the replies. Save yourself having to deal with them later.” — shows a focus on self-protection and control rather than open dialogue. They also mock those who complain about blocking, quoting someone saying “go ahead and block me because that is all your guy's responses ever is” and treating it as confirmation of their strategy, which aligns more with Slytherin’s unapologetic pragmatism than Hufflepuff’s fairness or Gryffindor’s confrontational bravery. Even when they reference data or broader perspective, such as amplifying that blocking can “filter out criticism” while still noting reply sentiment in “Based on an expanded sample of 200 replies, positives are still low at ~15%, with negatives around 65%”, it’s framed in service of managing perception and maintaining an advantageous position. Overall, the pattern of using social tools as weapons and shields, and treating conflict as something to be efficiently managed rather than debated, fits Slytherin more closely than the other houses.
Your movie
Your song
Shake It Off - Taylor Swift
A fitting song for @blocktuah is Shake It Off by Taylor Swift, because their entire timeline revolves around dismissing negativity and using the block button as a form of self-defense and curation. They openly celebrate mass blocking as a strategy, saying things like “You can safely block 99.99% of the accounts in the replies. Save yourself having to deal with them later.” and “Free blocklist in the replies for y'all :P”, which mirrors the song’s theme of refusing to be dragged down by haters. Their attitude of turning hostile replies into a "blocklist"—as in “free blocklist in the replies thanks for making my job easier you bums”—shows a playful, almost gleeful defiance that matches the song’s upbeat dismissal of criticism. Even when they’re on the receiving end, they respond with nonchalance and derision, as seen in “Oh no I got blocked for exposing hypocrisy womp fucking womp, take the L”, embodying the Shake It Off spirit of shrugging off drama and moving on. Overall, their blocking-as-self-care philosophy—described in tweets like “Blocking to me is how I check my garden for cut worms and other parasites.”—aligns perfectly with the song’s message of filtering out negativity and keeping one’s space clean from toxic noise.
Your time travel destination
Your video game
Your spirit animal
Your (un)funny joke
Your superpower
Your fictional best friend
Your dream vacation
Your alternate career path
Your celebrity match
Did you enjoy your Horoscope?
Your horoscope is 35 days old! Generate a better one from your latest tweets, unlock more insights and use a smarter pro AI!
