Strengths and Weaknesses
Strengths:
- Principled: Consistently defends free speech and free enterprise, e.g. celebrating US withdrawal from Paris Agreement as aligned with her values in “Today the U.S. is officially out of the Paris Climate Agreement and that’s worth cheering.”.
- Insider-knowledgeable: Draws on experience as an ex‑ESG insider to critique Davos/WEF mechanics, e.g. explaining power shifts in “I spoke with Andrew Gold about what actually goes on at Davos.”.
- Clear-communicator: Breaks complex ideas into simple patterns like the “limited hangout” and then illustrates them, e.g. “A limited hangout isn’t an outright lie. It’s a controlled admission…”.
- Courageous: Directly challenges powerful figures and institutions by name (Merz, Carney, Lagarde, WEF, EU), e.g. “Larry Fink has become an outright socialist.”.
- Consistent: Holds a coherent ideological line across topics—Net Zero, DEI, open borders, censorship all framed as one globalist project, e.g. “The WEF’s annual Davos meeting… Net Zero. DEI. Open borders. Censorship. CBDCs.”.
Weaknesses:
- Harsh-toned: Often uses insults or dismissive phrasing that can alienate neutrals, e.g. “Starmer is shit scared of Elon.” and “Nervous banal babble from Too Late Carney”.
- One-sided: Presents opponents as purely malicious or foolish with little acknowledgment of tradeoffs, e.g. “Capitalism didn’t fail. It was sabotaged by the Davos elite.” and “Not only are global climate change organizations anti American, they’re outright anti human.”.
- Generalizing: Makes sweeping claims about whole regions or groups, e.g. “German media is almost entirely biased radically to the left.” and “Europe today: Open borders ✔️ Crime ✔️ Antisemitism ✔️ Free speech ❌”.
- Alarmist: Frequently frames policies as existential “suicide” or “toast,” e.g. “Sorry to say, but Germany is toast under the anaemic leadership of Friedrich Merz.” and “Pure economic suicide.”.
- Solution-light: Strong on critique but often light on concrete, detailed alternatives beyond broad reversals (repeal Net Zero, cut regulation), e.g. in “The UK will continue to decline until Net Zero is repealed, red tape slashed borders closed and tax significantly reduced.”.
Your Simpsons character
Lisa Simpson
The best match is Lisa Simpson, but in her rebellious, red-pilled, hyper-political adult form rather than the obedient teacher’s pet. Like Lisa, Desiree Fixler is highly analytical and policy-focused, constantly dissecting systems of power—especially supranational and technocratic ones—such as when she says “Davos’s ‘warm collectivism’ claims to help ordinary people through more regulation. But only large corporations can afford it – and the costs are passed on.”. She combines moral conviction with economic literacy, critiquing Net Zero and overregulation in a very Lisa-like ‘wonk with a conscience’ way, for example: “Germany, please have a listen. Your Net Zero policy colossally failed…yet produce 20% less electricity at 3X the price.”. Lisa’s skepticism toward authority also fits her direct attacks on elites and institutions, such as the WEF and EU, as when she writes “The WEF’s annual Davos meeting…It’s a reinforcement network designed to keep the global elite in control via The Great Reset: Net Zero. DEI. Open borders. Censorship. CBDCs.”. Finally, both Lisa and this user combine idealism about freedom and human dignity with sharp criticism of those who claim moral high ground, as seen when she notes “Not only are global climate change organizations anti American, they’re outright anti human. They’ve manufactured a fake climate crisis to shakedown taxpayers and other funders.”.
Your MBTI personality Type
ENTJ
They present as highly outward‑facing, constantly engaging public figures, calling out leaders and institutions by name and relishing big stages like Davos, which fits Extraversion; for example, they openly challenge global elites and politicians in posts like “Buckle up, global elites.” and direct public letters such as “Dear Keir Starmer,”. Their focus is strongly conceptual and systems‑level rather than on small personal details, attacking overarching frameworks like Net Zero, ESG, WEF, and "global collectivism," as in “Capitalism didn’t fail. It was sabotaged by the Davos elite.” and “Davos’s ‘warm collectivism’ claims to help ordinary people through more regulation.”, which aligns with Intuition. Their tone is sharply analytical, argumentative, and often cutting—prioritizing logic and perceived truth over harmony—evident in tweets like “Larry Fink has become an outright socialist… Capitalism didn’t fail—it was sabotaged…” and blunt verdicts such as “Labour and Ed Miliband are outright lying.”, reflecting a strong Thinking preference. They show a structured, decisive, and judgmental stance on policy and leadership, continually insisting on clear direction and reversals of course (e.g., “The UK will continue to decline until Net Zero is repealed, red tape slashed borders closed and tax significantly reduced.” and “Germany, please have a listen. Your Net Zero policy colossally failed.”), which is characteristic of Judging. Overall, their assertive leadership tone, macro‑strategic focus, confrontational logic, and demand for decisive policy changes are most consistent with ENTJ.
Some pickup lines for you
- You talk about WEF ‘limited hangouts’—how about we skip the controlled disclosures and go straight to full transparency over coffee in London?
- If Europe is, as you put it, “toast under anaemic leadership,” maybe we should meet up and form a small, high‑energy coalition of the willing—no consultants, no red tape, just wine and debate.
- You’ve seen Davos from the inside and called out how capitalism was sabotaged—care to join forces and run a stress test on my portfolio of bad first dates? I promise: less cronyism, more free enterprise chemistry.
- You cheered the US leaving the Paris Climate Agreement because Net Zero wrecks affordability—so how about I take you somewhere that’s high on freedom, low on ESG, and where the only thing overheating is our conversation?
- You praised Howard Lutnick for telling it like it is and loved Trump’s anti‑WEF speech; in that spirit of radical honesty: I find your takedowns on Merz, Carney, and Starmer devastatingly sharp—and I’d like to be your next long‑form argument partner.
Your 5 Emojis
Your new Twitter bio
Ex–Davos insider turned whistleblower on Net Zero & ESG. Defending free markets and free speech from London, with a front-row seat to Europe’s decline.– @desireefixler
Your signature cocktail
The Limited Hangout Highball
Smoky Scotch whisky stands in for her unapologetic, pro–free-market bluntness and admiration for straight talkers like Howard Lutnick and Trump, as seen when she cheers, “Capitalism didn’t fail. It was sabotaged by the Davos elite.” and “President Trump at Davos: 'The Green New Scam, the Greatest Hoax in History....' Couldn't be more true.”. Cold brew coffee concentrate captures her relentless, high-energy critique of global elites and ESG capture, pulsing through threads like “Davos’s ‘warm collectivism’ claims to help ordinary people… But only large corporations can afford it.”. A bitter Italian amaro reflects her taste for exposing uncomfortable truths about Europe’s decline and overregulation, echoing lines such as “Europe is in structural decline… So Europe destroyed its own energy, smothered growth with regulation…” and “ECB: Europe’s own regulations are the real trade barriers — not Trump.”. A dash of chili tincture nods to her spicy takedowns of Net Zero and climate institutions, like “Ah, here we go. The WEF can’t resist a firm push of the climate hoax.” and “The Green Climate Fund is a complete scam.”. Finally, a twist of lemon peel represents the sharp, zesty wit behind her “limited hangout” theme, from “The art of the limited hangout: Admit the obvious… Then change nothing.” to “I keep coming back to the limited hangout because it explains a lot.”, giving the drink a bright top note over a strong, bitter backbone—just like her feed.
Your Hogwarts House
Slytherin
The dominant traits in these tweets are ambition, strategic opposition to powerful institutions, and a sharp, often ruthless political clarity, all of which align most strongly with Slytherin. She openly frames herself as an "ex ESG insider" and activist taking on global elites, describing how "capitalism didn’t fail. It was sabotaged by the Davos elite" in a podcast promotion with Michael Shellenberger, showing both insider ambition and a willingness to weaponize that knowledge against former allies: “Capitalism didn’t fail. It was sabotaged by the Davos elite.”. Her language is frequently combative and tactical rather than conciliatory, e.g., mocking Mark Carney with, “Mark, mark my words – pop goes the weasel.” and predicting WEF resilience while analyzing power dynamics: “Sadly, my prediction: the WEF will be stronger than ever.”. She focuses on power, capture, and manipulation—calling ESG, WEF, and climate institutions "globalist organizations" that shift "wealth and power... upward to a global elite" and describing tactics like the "limited hangout": “A limited hangout isn’t an outright lie. It’s a controlled admission… to protect the core deception.”. While there is courage in attacking entrenched elites, the through-line is strategic, power-aware, and outcome-focused rather than idealistic or scholarly, making Slytherin the best overall fit.
Your movie
Your song
Won't Get Fooled Again - The Who
A song about seeing through false revolutions and refusing to trust new elites fits her relentless skepticism of global institutions and technocratic ‘saviors’. She repeatedly calls out what she sees as managed deception and cosmetic reform, for example describing Merz’s Davos performance as a “limited hang out” where leaders “Admit the obvious—Europe has economic and security problems…Then change nothing.”. Like the song’s warning that the new boss is the same as the old boss, she argues that elite projects such as the WEF and Net Zero simply entrench power at the top, saying Davos is “a reinforcement network designed to keep the global elite in control via The Great Reset: Net Zero. DEI. Open borders. Censorship. CBDCs.” “Let’s be honest—it’s not.”. Her insistence on free speech and resistance to what she sees as captured institutions—cheering that the U.S. is out of Paris because “Net Zero under Paris was never about clean air…It fixated on carbon targets and punitive regulation” “and that’s worth cheering.”—mirrors the song’s defiant, anti-authoritarian tone. Overall, the track’s mix of cynicism about ruling classes and determination not to be duped again captures her persona as an insider-turned-critic of the global managerial class.
Your time travel destination
Your video game
Your spirit animal
Your (un)funny joke
Your superpower
Your fictional best friend
Your dream vacation
Your alternate career path
Your celebrity match
Did you enjoy your Horoscope?
Your horoscope is 23 days old! Generate a better one from your latest tweets, unlock more insights and use a smarter pro AI!
