Strengths and Weaknesses
Strengths:
- Principled: Consistently defends republicanism and democratic accountability, e.g. criticising unelected power in “The Lords have no reasonably defensible right to do anything.” and promoting elected heads of state in “Four great heads of state…”.
- Courageous: Openly confronts powerful institutions like the monarchy, police, and media, such as calling Thames Valley Police’s protest limits “contemptible behaviour” in “Outrageous that Thames Valley Police have effectively banned protest in Windsor.”.
- Consistent: Maintains a clear, steady stance across topics—royals, Reform, Labour, FOI, climate—e.g. repeatedly highlighting royal hypocrisy on environment in “This is a man with one of the largest personal carbon footprints in the UK.” and “Appalling hypocrite doing damage to the planet.”.
- Media‑savvy: Understands and uses media narratives, critiquing royal PR spin and broadcaster bias in “Like the BBC, Sky is required to be impartial. This is a dreadful puff piece…” and promoting a BBC documentary he appears in in “Check it out let me know what you think of What's the Monarchy for?”.
- Supportive: Uses platform to boost others’ causes, e.g. fundraising tweet for a wheelchair rugby club in “My friend Deborah Searle is raising £2000…” and praising FOI work by Royals Costs Watch in “Royals Costs Watch is doing some excellent FOI work…”.
Weaknesses:
- Harshly dismissive: Frequently uses curt put‑downs (“Meaningless drivel.” in this tweet; “No.” as a standalone rebuttal in this tweet), which can shut down dialogue rather than persuade.
- One‑note tone: Nearly every tweet is critical or mocking, even when brief nuance could help, e.g. “William and Kate have proven themselves awful ambassadors.” and “They’re all dreadful at giving speeches.”, creating a relentlessly negative impression.
- Personalistic attacks: Criticism often targets individuals’ character or competence (“He’s a bore, just not a pub bore.” in this tweet; “Woman with zero experience of work lecturing business leaders…” in this tweet), which can look ad hominem rather than issue‑focused.
- Limited bridge‑building: Language like “A nobody gets PR in China” in this tweet and “Monarchists not so keen on free speech or democracy.” in this tweet risks alienating potential moderates who might agree on reforms but not the rhetoric.
- Low optimism: Framing is heavily focused on hypocrisy, failure, and futility—e.g. “Utterly meaningless. They do so little and yet still spin the idea they’re making a difference.” and “Stay? If they disappeared today no one would notice…”—with relatively few constructive or hopeful alternatives articulated.
Your Simpsons character
Lisa Simpson
The account most closely matches Lisa Simpson: intellectually driven, politically outspoken, and deeply critical of entrenched power structures. Like Lisa’s anti-authoritarian, pro-republican streak, he relentlessly challenges the monarchy and hereditary privilege, calling knighthoods and honours “More proof knighthoods are a nonsense.” and dismissing royal PR as “Utterly meaningless. They do so little and yet still spin the idea they’re making a difference.” His strong concern for climate justice and elite hypocrisy mirrors Lisa’s activism, for instance describing Charles as “a hypocrite” and “one of the largest private polluters in the country.” The user’s emphasis on democracy, accountability, and reform — arguing that “The Lords have no reasonably defensible right to do anything.” and that monarchists are “not so keen on free speech or democracy.” — strongly echoes Lisa’s principled, sometimes lonely opposition to the status quo. Even the self-aware, argumentative tone in his bio and replies, such as “I’d like to know if the duchies of Cornwall and Lancaster are going to be exempt from this law.” and “Victims are not served by removing jury trials.”, fits Lisa’s habit of insisting on rational, ethical scrutiny even when it’s unpopular.
Your MBTI personality Type
ENTJ
They show strong Extraversion (E) through constant public engagement, argument-starting, and willingness to be a visible figurehead (CEO of Republic, media appearances, protests), e.g. describing themselves as someone who “only ever wants to start an argument.” and frequently challenging high‑profile figures like Charles and Starmer in front of a large audience. Their focus is clearly Intuitive (N): they repeatedly attack systemic structures—monarchy, House of Lords, electoral systems—rather than small, sensory details, e.g. arguing that “removing big money and breaking the two party system would go a long way” and that the Lords have “no reasonably defensible right” and should be replaced with an elected upper house. Their tone is heavily Thinking (T): they are blunt, critical, and often dismissive—calling royal statements “meaningless drivel”, knighthoods “a nonsense”, and royal PR “BS dressed up to justify grift and junkets”—focusing on consistency, hypocrisy, and evidence (FOI requests, costs, legal accountability). They are strongly Judging (J): they favour clear structures, accountability, and decisive reform—wanting to abolish the monarchy, scrap the Lords, cap ground rents at £1, and enforce transparency on Andrew, e.g. insisting that “Andrew needs to comply with this request or give a plausible reason why he won’t.”. Across the feed, they show strategic, goal‑oriented activism and long‑term planning (constant campaigning, structured institutional critiques) rather than flexible, laid‑back exploration, which aligns more with ENTJ than ENTP. Overall, the combination of outspoken leadership, systemic focus, logical critique, and reform‑driven decisiveness fits ENTJ best.
Some pickup lines for you
- If monarchs are just ‘ornamental patrons’ and ‘empty PR’, can I apply to be your hardworking republican consort instead—paid not in Duchy incomes, but in long rants over coffee about Charles’ carbon footprint?
- You said William ‘has no idea how communities work’—want to run a real one together? We can start with a local republic of two in a London pub that the king definitely isn’t lifting a finger to save.
- Since you called knighthoods ‘a nonsense’ and honours ‘joke honours’, how about we abolish titles altogether—except I’ll still call you “the one I’d cross a Met Police protest line to have lunch with” (no connection to any strategic backdowns, of course).
- You’re right that the anthem is ‘tedious and uninspiring’, but I’m happy to replace ‘God Save the King’ with something more uplifting, like ‘Graham Said Yes to a Drink’—far more democratic and with a much better chorus.
- You keep saying Charles’ soft power is useless and that royals are ‘hypocrites and dilettantes on the environment’—I can’t fix the climate alone, but I can promise my personal carbon footprint includes zero flights to Saudi and at least one slow, low-emission walk with you through Windsor… preferably during a NotMyKing protest.
Your 5 Emojis
Your new Twitter bio
Leading UK republican, CEO of Republic & author of ‘Abolish the Monarchy’. Once had lunch mid-row with the Palace—and they backed down before dessert.– @GrahamSmith_
Your signature cocktail
The Not My King Sling
The London dry gin base nods to his London roots and classic republican seriousness, as seen in his relentless critiques like “Monarchists not so keen on free speech or democracy.”. A hit of bitter Campari captures his sharp, uncompromising tone in posts such as “Meaningless drivel.” and “Joke honours.”. Cloudy apple juice adds a mellow, approachable sweetness that reflects his dry humour in lines like “He also backed down after I had lunch. The two aren’t connected.”. Fresh lemon juice represents the tart clarity of his constant fact-checking and demands for scrutiny, such as “Zero journalistic scrutiny of William’s claimed environmentalism.”. Finally, a dash of smoked salt or mezcal rinse evokes the lingering burn of his anti-monarchy activism in tweets like “The royals are hypocrites and dilettantes on the environment.” and his rallying cry “#AbolishTheMonarchy #NotMyKing”, giving the drink a rebellious finish.
Your Hogwarts House
Gryffindor
Graham Smith fits best in Gryffindor because his defining trait across the timeline is confrontational courage and a willingness to pick public fights with powerful institutions. His bio literally foregrounds conflict — “Only ever wants to start an argument.” — and his feed shows him persistently attacking the monarchy, government, police, and major broadcasters despite inevitable backlash, for example calling Charles “a hypocrite” over climate issues in “Charles has a huge carbon footprint… He is a hypocrite.” and describing royal engagements as “Utterly meaningless” in “Utterly meaningless. They do so little and yet still spin the idea they’re making a difference.”. He regularly challenges police and state power around protest, e.g. denouncing Thames Valley Police’s actions as “Contemptible behaviour” in “Outrageous that Thames Valley Police have effectively banned protest in Windsor… Contemptible behaviour.”, which shows a Gryffindor-like readiness to confront authority directly. His tone is more blunt and combative than calculating: he dismisses royal PR as “BS” in “Royal PR real is BS dressed up to justify grift and junkets.” and labels people and ideas “Meaningless drivel.” in “Meaningless drivel.”, suggesting impulsive, plain-spoken moral courage rather than Slytherin-style tact or Ravenclaw detachment. While there are elements of leadership and principle (he’s CEO of Republic and chairs a campaign group), his public persona is dominated by fearless, sometimes provocative stands against entrenched power, which aligns most strongly with Gryffindor values of bravery and outspoken conviction.
Your movie
Your song
Killing in the Name - Rage Against the Machine
Their feed is a sustained, angry challenge to entrenched power, especially the monarchy and political establishment, which fits the anti-authoritarian fury of Killing in the Name. They repeatedly attack royal privilege and hypocrisy, calling Charles “a hypocrite” for his carbon footprint in “Charles has a huge carbon footprint and deflects attention from the real cause of climate change…” and mocking royal PR as “Utterly meaningless. They do so little and yet still spin the idea they’re making a difference.”. Their bio quote, “Only ever wants to start an argument,” shows a confrontational streak that mirrors the song’s refusal to accept deference to authority. They also push for systemic change, demanding an elected upper house in “The sooner they're scrapped and replaced with an elected upper house the better.” and highlighting royal costs and secrecy in “The royals have a unique and unjustifiable exemption from freedom of info laws…”. The song’s theme of resisting oppressive institutions aligns with their #AbolishTheMonarchy activism, as seen in posts like “Four great heads of state… During the same time we’ve had silent and aloof monarchs…”.
Your time travel destination
Your video game
Your spirit animal
Your (un)funny joke
Your superpower
Your fictional best friend
Your dream vacation
Your alternate career path
Your celebrity match
Did you enjoy your Horoscope?
Your horoscope is 23 days old! Generate a better one from your latest tweets, unlock more insights and use a smarter pro AI!
