Strengths and Weaknesses
Strengths:
- Consistent Discipline: Their 100-day LeetCode streak and daily logs like “leetcode day 10/100 check inclusion (beats 100%)…” show steady, structured practice.
- Reflective Learner: They revisit and critique their own solutions, e.g. “in the future, i will try to use .find() instead of hacky solutions” and “bad product of array solution vs better solution”.
- Growth Mindset: They frame failures as learning, like “today wasnt the best.. onto the next” after struggling with problems.
- Curious Thinker: They ask conceptual questions such as “how is it possible google authenticator works offline ?? ” and ponder ideas from books like The Inner Game of Tennis and The Almanack of Naval Ravikant.
- Self-Aware Humor: They use self-deprecating jokes to cope and reflect, e.g. “fuck my chud life i will never b profitable” and “highlighting and doodling on your high school chemistry is now considered studying hard in the big 26”.
Weaknesses:
- Harsh Self-Talk: They describe themselves and their situation negatively, e.g. “fuck my chud life i will never b profitable” and “i feel like i don’t spend enough of my mental compute thinking about things that actually matter”.
- Perfectionist Pressure: They fixate on performance metrics like beats percentages and express frustration, as in “daily leetcode 12/100… reserving and better practice can take it to beats 85%” and complaints about job applications being exhausting.
- Negative Cynicism: They express cynical views about markets and integrity, e.g. “integrity dies in the face of money” and skepticism about ever being profitable in trading.
- Productivity Guilt: They beat themselves up for missed habits, as in “Fuck i forgot to read yesterday” and feeling they don’t think about “things that actually matter.”
- Token Frustration: They show irritation with tools or systems that feel inefficient, like “is this dumbass bot designed to waste as many tokens as possible”, which can signal impatience under friction.
Your Simpsons character
Lisa Simpson
This user most closely resembles Lisa Simpson: intellectually curious, self-driven, and a bit perfectionistic. Their structured LeetCode grind and reflection on solution quality, like tracking 'day 12/100' and noting that they’ll 'work on using .find() for the next redo of the solution' in “4/100 longest consecutive sequence will work on using .find() for the next redo of the solution”, mirrors Lisa’s academic rigor and desire for self-improvement. They show meta-cognition and philosophical curiosity, as in “i feel like i don’t spend enough of my mental compute thinking about things that actually matter” and their reflection on Self 1 vs Self 2 in “I understood the idea of Self 2 and how we naturally grow when we don't force ourselves to perform, but perhaps the biggest undeveloped argument I had was: why does Self 1 exist if it is so inefficient and obtrusive?”. At the same time, their dry, slightly cynical humor about markets and productivity, like “good reminder to self that no matter how well u think u can comprehend a markets behaviour with your mental model you can never fully understand the whims of the market”, fits Lisa’s mix of idealism and realism. The combination of technical focus (CS/eng, LeetCode), reflective reading (Naval Ravikant), and occasional existential frustration, such as “fuck my chud life i will never b profitable”, strongly aligns with Lisa’s thoughtful, driven, and sometimes world-weary personality.
Your MBTI personality Type
INTJ
They seem more introverted (I) than extroverted: their tweets revolve around solitary pursuits like grinding LeetCode (“leetcode day 10/100 check inclusion (beats 100%) this actually took so long to figure out but it was so worth it.”) and reading (“Finished today. I understood the idea of Self 2 and how we naturally grow when we don't force ourselves to perform…”), with no emphasis on parties or large social gatherings. Their thinking shows a clear intuition (N) bias: they like abstractions, meta-ideas, and models, such as quoting the classic CS aphorism (“All problems in computer science can be solved by another layer of indirection.”) and musing about evolutionary psychology and the nature of Self 1 vs Self 2 in learning (“Why has it persisted despite Darwinism?”). They lean strongly thinking (T): they focus on performance metrics, efficiency, and correctness (“is O(26N) with minimal if statements vs O(N) better?”), critique bad reasoning in fitness articles (“If you know anything about fitness, reading this might be enough to make you lose all trust in every other X article.”), and are often blunt or sardonic (“is this dumbass bot designed to waste as many tokens as possible”). Their behavior fits judging (J): they run a structured 100-day LeetCode plan (“1/100 leetcode everyday”, “daily leetcode 12/100”), track improvements and redos (“redid product of array cos i didnt like my sol yesterday”), and explicitly reflect on future optimization strategies (“in the future, i will try to use .find() instead of hacky solutions”). Putting these together—introspective, systems/abstraction-oriented, logic-driven, and structured with a focus on improvement and long-term strategy—INTJ best matches their online persona.
Some pickup lines for you
- If we were a LeetCode problem, I’d be the Sliding Window Maximum and you’d be the element always staying in my deque—because no matter how far I move, I still only have eyes on you, day 12/100 style.
- You said Google Authenticator working offline blew your mind—wait till you see how well we sync without Wi‑Fi. I’m talking pure TOTP: Tacoz One‑Time Partner.
- You keep redoing problems like Valid Sudoku and Insert Interval until you hit beats 100%. Respectfully, I’d like to apply the same grindset to winning you over—constant refactors until the runtime of your replies goes to O(instant).
- NotebookLM reminded you of the first time you touched Claude and Copilot for coding; I’m just hoping the first time you talk to me feels like that same ‘oh wow this changes everything’ moment—minus the token limits.
- You tweet about markets being impossible to fully model and that you’ll ‘never b profitable,’ but from where I’m standing, going long on a 19 y/o CS/eng grinding 100 days of LeetCode and reading Naval is the highest EV trade on the timeline.
Your 5 Emojis
Your new Twitter bio
19 • CS/Eng student grinding 100 days of LeetCode, reading Naval, and overthinking markets. Once forgot to read but never forgets to refactor.– @iabsolvetacoz
Your signature cocktail
The Sliding Window Sour
The Japanese whisky nods to their market-brain and quiet intensity, a spirit as precise and disciplined as grinding LeetCode every day from 1/100 to 12/100 with posts like “leetcode day 10/100 check inclusion (beats 100%) this actually took so long to figure out but it was so worth it.”. Matcha honey syrup mixes focus and sweetness, mirroring thoughtful reflections like “i feel like i don’t spend enough of my mental compute thinking about things that actually matter” and their experiments with NotebookLM in “trying notebooklm and it has been such an incredible experience.”. Grapefruit juice brings a sharp, slightly bitter edge that fits lines like “fuck my chud life i will never b profitable” and “why is applying to a job so hard that took two hours”, capturing the grindy frustration under their humor. An espresso ice cube represents their late-night, high-energy coding and reading, powering through failures like “sliding window maximum (failed) today wasnt the best.. onto the next” and then coming back stronger in “Sliding Window Maximum (beats 54%) … Minimum Window Substring (beats 100%)”. Finally, a dash of saline stands for their salty, self-aware wit in tweets like “is this dumbass bot designed to waste as many tokens as possible” and “the super bowl is like marketing majors’ super bowl”, giving the drink an experimental, slightly trolling finish that still tastes surprisingly balanced.
Your Hogwarts House
Ravenclaw
This user shows a clear love of learning and analytical thinking, which are core Ravenclaw traits. They consistently document a rigorous self-improvement routine in algorithmic problem solving, for example tracking performance and revisiting solutions in tweets like “leetcode day 10/100 check inclusion (beats 100%) this actually took so long to figure out but it was so worth it. exercise to the reader: is O(26N) with minimal if statements vs O(N) better?” and “in the future, i will try to use .find() instead of hacky solutions”, which shows meta-cognition about code quality and complexity. Their curiosity about how things work extends beyond coding, as seen in “how is it possible google authenticator works offline ?? ”, indicating an instinct to probe underlying mechanisms rather than accept tools at face value. They also reflect deeply on ideas from books and mental models, like in “I understood the idea of Self 2 and how we naturally grow when we don't force ourselves to perform, but perhaps the biggest undeveloped argument I had was: why does Self 1 exist if it is so inefficient and obtrusive?” and “i feel like i don’t spend enough of my mental compute thinking about things that actually matter”, which shows philosophical reflection and self-analysis. While there is some ambition and frustration (e.g., trying to be profitable in markets), the dominant pattern is intellectual curiosity, optimization, and enjoyment of problem-solving, aligning most strongly with Ravenclaw rather than the goal-oriented edge of Slytherin or the more social/values focus of Gryffindor and Hufflepuff.
Your movie
Your song
Stronger - Kanye West
A fitting song for them is Stronger because so many of their tweets are about grinding through difficulty, learning from failure, and coming back better the next day. Their LeetCode streak shows a relentless improvement mindset, even when they struggle: “leetcode day 11/100 ... min window (didntmanage to do) ... sliding window maximum (failed) today wasnt the best.. onto the next” and then later celebrating progress with “daily leetcode 12/100: Sliding Window Maximum (beats 54%) ... Minimum Window Substring (beats 100%) ... Valid Parentheses (beats 100%)”. This mirrors the song’s core line, "that that don't kill me can only make me stronger." They also constantly refine their solutions and thinking, like when they say “in the future, i will try to use .find() instead of hacky solutions” and reflect on mental models and self-improvement in markets and life: “good reminder to self that no matter how well u think u can comprehend a markets behaviour with your mental model you can never fully understand the whims of the market”. Overall, their mix of technical obsession, introspection, and resilience fits the determined, self-optimizing energy of Stronger.
Your time travel destination
Your video game
Your spirit animal
Your (un)funny joke
Your superpower
Your fictional best friend
Your dream vacation
Your alternate career path
Your celebrity match
Did you enjoy your Horoscope?
Your horoscope is 7 days old! Generate a better one from your latest tweets, unlock more insights and use a smarter pro AI!
