Strengths and Weaknesses
Strengths:
- Principled: Consistently centers Islam, tawheed, and sharia as non‑negotiable standards, e.g. “Opposing Muslims who fight to establish tawheed and Allah's sharia…” and “Recognizing and having diplomatic relations with America is effectively the same as recognizing and having diplomatic relations with Israel.”
- Analytical: Writes long, structured threads on geopolitics, economics, and technology, such as “I'll divide this into two parts: Part One… Part Two…” and the detailed critique of heavy industry in “There are a few issues here.”
- Committed: Shows strong dedication to causes he believes Islamic, including publishing a book “By the permission of Allah, I am announcing the publishing of 'Jihad and the Neo Colonial State of Pakistan.'” and urging support for court cases “Anyone in the NYC area… there is a Muslim brother going to trial for murder…”
- Historically‑minded: Regularly references Islamic and world history to frame present issues, like demographic engineering and the Prophet’s ﷺ expeditions in “Demographic engineering is an underappreciated field…” and British imperial history in “In my research on the origins of modern political systems…”
- Critical‑thinker: Questions dominant assumptions about ‘progress,’ nationalism, and state structures as in “Exposing the fallacy of technological 'progress' and 'development' is critical for tawheed in our time;…” and “I don't understand how most Pakistanis are ignorant about nationalism…”
Weaknesses:
- Inflammatory‑rhetoric: Uses language that dehumanizes or broadly attacks groups, such as “it's not 'slave morality' to not want to be like the West, they are literally slaves of Jews” and praising psychological operations targeting ‘soft’ targets in “Is killing civilians 'bad for da'wah'?”
- Violence‑normalization: Frames armed conflict and mass casualties as spiritually desirable outcomes, e.g. “If some reaches true and sincere internal commitment to attain shahada… they will not find a shortage of opportunities.” and “The ones who hasten its end are doing a great…” about collapsing current systems despite ‘mass death’.
- Polarizing‑judgment: Labels large segments of Muslims as munafiqin or effectively liberal/anti‑Islamic, such as “The only way munafiqin will ever accept sharia is if they fear the Muslims more than they fear the kuffar.” and “Opposing Muslims who fight to establish tawheed… is effectively a liberal, secular attitude.”
- Dismissive‑tone: Sometimes dismisses critics as mentally colonized or cowardly rather than engaging their arguments, e.g. “Mentally colonized Muslims: City planning without building permits? NOoooO…” and “The sad reality is that the reason many Muslim argue against modern jihad… is because… they're afraid.”
- Limited‑empathy: Public focus on strategic and theological frames often overrides concern for human costs, as in treating deaths of non‑combatants as ‘inescapable’ and a da'wah calculation in “Is killing civilians 'bad for da'wah'?” and framing mass casualties as an unavoidable part of ending an evil system in “The issue is that the mass death happens anyway…”
Your Simpsons character
Lisa Simpson
The account combines intense moral seriousness with intellectual analysis, much like Lisa Simpson. Lisa often challenges the legitimacy of existing systems, and this user repeatedly critiques global and Muslim-world political structures, for example arguing that, “Recognizing and having diplomatic relations with America is effectively the same as recognizing and having diplomatic relations with Israel.” Lisa is also bookish and ideological, and this user frames issues through doctrinal and historical lenses, such as in, “Exposing the fallacy of technological 'progress' and 'development' is critical for tawheed in our time; the perceived need for this 'progress' and 'development' is the main justification for kufr and shirk among modern Islamic political movements.” Like Lisa, who often feels like an outsider in her own town, this user positions himself against both Western liberal norms and many mainstream Muslims, saying, “All I'm really saying is that you need to stop helping your enemies before you can effectively fight them. This is not really that radical or strange.” Finally, the account’s clear preference for principle over comfort or status echoes Lisa’s idealism, as seen in statements like, “Anyone who thinks that speaking to the United Nations General Assembly in New York is better than speaking to Allah from inside ADX Florence has been deceived by dunya.”
Your MBTI personality Type
INTJ
They present as an introvert (I): there is no focus on their own social life, selfies, or interpersonal drama, and their bio note “Please no DMs from women” signals a strong boundary around private interaction rather than attention-seeking. Nearly all tweets are long-form reflections rather than attempts to socialize. They are clearly intuitive (N): many posts zoom out to systemic or theoretical levels, such as “Exposing the fallacy of technological 'progress' and 'development' is critical for tawheed in our time; the perceived need for this 'progress' and 'development' is the main justification for kufr and shirk among modern Islamic political movements.” and “Demographic engineering is an underappreciated field, particularly when it comes to Islamic political projects.” Their style is strongly thinking (T) over feeling: arguments are structured, analytical, and often harshly critical, e.g. “Opposing Muslims who fight to establish tawheed and Allah's sharia simply because they commit some (perceived) violations in spilling impermissible blood is effectively a liberal, secular attitude.” and “Any Muslim who is serious about wanting to establish Islamic government and bringing the oppressors to justice must be mentally prepared for the eventuality of having no privileges of ANY national citizenship whatsoever.”. They prioritize consistency and logic in ideology even when it is emotionally costly for others. They lean judging (J): there is a strong sense of structure, long-term vision, and categorical conclusions—e.g. “Recognizing and having diplomatic relations with America is effectively the same as recognizing and having diplomatic relations with Israel.” and “All I'm really saying is that you need to stop helping your enemies before you can effectively fight them. This is not really that radical or strange.”. Overall, the combination of strategic, big-picture geopolitical thinking, doctrinal certainty, and low emphasis on personal warmth aligns best with INTJ.
Some pickup lines for you
- You said those who help bring down this evil system become part of its destruction—so if we got married for the sake of Allah and moved off-grid with livestock, dried fruits, and self‑custodied bitcoin, would that count as jihad *and* a love story?
- You’re out here analyzing B2 bomber economies of scale, chip supply chains, and neo‑colonial finance—how about we run a small empirical study on whether companionship optimizes my iman the way you say sharia optimizes city planning?
- You wrote that Western sci‑fi is liberal proselytism, but ‘Dune’ helped you find Islam; if I tell you you’re my own personal Fremen mujahid rewriting my eschatology, is that tawheed‑compliant or just dangerously romantic analogy?
- You talk about those few hundred Muslims who spent $500k and made the US blow $8 trillion—statistically speaking, if I invest just one sincere salaam in you, what’s the expected ROI in baraka and late‑night geopolitics discussions?
- You mentioned walking to Hajj from Maghreb with no passport, building a house with no permits, and markets with no bureaucracy—shall we start by bypassing all modern intermediaries and letting our wali arrange a merger of assets: livestock, ammo, and hearts fi sabilillah?
Your 5 Emojis
Your new Twitter bio
Writer on jihad, empire, and Muslim futures. Part-time ring-sunnah enthusiast, full-time critic of neo-colonial ‘progress’ and Gulf oil baraka.– @ibn_alJad
Your signature cocktail
The Neo‑Colonial Nightwatch (Non‑Alc Mujahideen Mule)
This drink is strong, dark, and uncompromising, like his conviction that “fighting for the sake of making Islam dominant over kufr is jihad fi sabilillah” “Fighting for the sake of making Islam dominant over kufr is jihad fi sabilillah…”. The smoky black tea reduction stands in for the long, simmered history and ideological depth behind his threads on geopolitics and colonialism, like when he dissects “Jihad and the Neo Colonial State of Pakistan” “By the permission of Allah, I am announcing the publishing of 'Jihad and the Neo Colonial State of Pakistan.'”. Pomegranate molasses brings a tart, blood‑red sweetness that echoes his focus on sacrifice and shahada, as when he writes that those who seek martyrdom “will not find a shortage of opportunities” “If some reaches true and sincere internal commitment to attain shahada in the path of Allah azza wa jalla, they will not find a shortage of opportunities.”. The sharp lime and fiery ginger beer capture his cutting critiques of regimes and neo‑colonial systems, such as calling the current order a “riba driven Zionist world order” “Those living under the riba driven Zionist world order are like drunks…”. Finally, the pinch of sea salt nods to his insistence on realism and hard truths over feel‑good narratives, like when he warns that believing Muslims are not winning “requires rejecting authentic hadith” “Believing that Muslims are not 'winning' right now requires rejecting authentic hadith.”, grounding the whole mix in something bracing, serious, and unwilling to dilute the message.
Your Hogwarts House
Slytherin
Their dominant traits are ambition, ideological absolutism, and strategic, power-focused thinking, which align most with Slytherin. They repeatedly frame global politics in terms of overthrowing an "evil" world order and explicitly valorize participating in bringing it down: “If this system is fundamentally evil and based upon falsehood (it is), then fighting it is in itself a source of spiritual reward… by participating in bringing it down, even in small ways, we become”, and they celebrate demographic engineering and large-scale social reordering: “Demographic engineering is an underappreciated field, particularly when it comes to Islamic political projects.”. They show comfort with ruthlessness and instrumental thinking about violence and psychological operations, for example questioning whether killing civilians is really "bad for da'wah" and analytically dissecting the "civilian" concept: “Critically examining the concept of 'civilians' in light of modern industrial warfare” and “Is killing civilians 'bad for da'wah'? A common argument against psychological operations against 'soft' targets…”. At the same time, they exhibit strong resourcefulness and long-term plotting, talking about parallel infrastructures, political economy, and how to exploit structural weaknesses of global powers: “To understand geopolitics and political economy it's important to be able to 'zoom out' far enough to view technologies like military hardware and infrastructure as tools in and of themselves.”. While there is some Gryffindor-like valorization of martyrdom and bravery in jihad, the consistent emphasis on power, strategy, and ends-justify-the-means thinking fits Slytherin more than any other house.
Your movie
Your song
Killing in the Name - Rage Against the Machine
A song about rage at oppressive systems and refusal to submit aligns strongly with how @ibn_alJad frames the modern world as a "riba driven Zionist world order" and "fundamentally evil" system that must be fought, as in "If this system is fundamentally evil and based upon falsehood (it is), then fighting it is in itself a source of spiritual reward.". Their emphasis on jihad, struggle, and rejecting collaboration with global powers echoes the song’s core theme of resistance, for example when they say "Recognizing and having diplomatic relations with America is effectively the same as recognizing and having diplomatic relations with Israel.". The song’s hostility to institutions that enforce an unjust order parallels their critiques of Muslim governments propped up by external powers, as in "These countries are actually ruled by liberalism. Their rulers are propped up by kuffar, and the abuses and corruption that happen in them serves and protects the kuffar.". Finally, the uncompromising, almost confrontational tone of the song fits their admiration for those who sacrifice for Islam and their assertion that "Those who sacrifice their lives and wealth for the sake of Allah and His religion are the most deserving of husn adh dhun."
Your time travel destination
Your video game
Your spirit animal
Your (un)funny joke
Your superpower
Your fictional best friend
Your dream vacation
Your alternate career path
Your celebrity match
Did you enjoy your Horoscope?
Your horoscope is 36 days old! Generate a better one from your latest tweets, unlock more insights and use a smarter pro AI!
