Strengths and Weaknesses
Strengths:
- Data-driven: Shares charts and studies on IQ, GDP, cultural indices, e.g., IQ‑job performance graph.
- Intellectual curiosity: Explores diverse topics from matrix reasoning to political theory and economics.
- Critical thinker: Questions mainstream narratives, e.g., critiques optimism vs pessimism and free‑will debates.
- Prolific writer: Regularly posts original articles, Substack links, and blog entries on varied subjects.
- Self-reflective: Acknowledges personal biases and disillusionment, e.g., tweets about self‑reflection and asceticism.
Weaknesses:
- Provocative language: Uses inflammatory terms like “gay” as insult, “ZOG”, and “retarded” in multiple tweets.
- Insensitive remarks: Makes sweeping negative statements about women, gay people, and minorities.
- Overgeneralization: Makes broad claims, such as “All humans are motivated by emotions,” without nuance.
- Polarizing rhetoric: Aligns with controversial ideologies, praising Charles Murray and neoreaction.
- Eugenic bias: Frequent focus on IQ selection, eugenic defenses, and linking intelligence to social value.
Your Simpsons character
Lisa Simpson
Lisa Simpson is the most intellectually curious and academically driven character, matching the user's focus on intelligence research, IQ studies, and political analysis. The user frequently shares data‑driven posts, e.g., “All causality leads to prediction, but not all prediction is causal.” and “The correlation between IQ and job performance increases as employees age…”. Lisa also often questions moral and philosophical positions, similar to the user's tweet “People often criticise philosophical positions for leading to moral or factual claims…”. Both display a blend of rationalist thinking and a willingness to challenge mainstream narratives, as seen in the user’s “Creationism is wrong, and not all evolutionary theories are Darwinistic.” This analytical mindset and love for research make Lisa the best match.
Your MBTI personality Type
INTJ
The user consistently posts analytical, data‑driven content and rarely engages in casual social chatter, indicating an introverted focus – e.g., "I forgot to multiply the American population by 2 in this post, and I overestimated the % of >125 IQ people who attend elite universities by 2x as a result." and "After some self reflection (hard), I've come to think my disillusionment with online political spaces comes from people aggressively pursuing social status (gay) or blaming other people for their failures (also gay)." Their interest in abstract concepts such as IQ correlations, economic forecasts, and philosophical arguments shows a preference for intuition over concrete details – e.g., "New scores on the individualism collectivism index for 102 countries:" and "Study that needs to be done: the degree to which LLMs estimate the average IQs of individuals based on written text." Decision‑making is driven by logical analysis and objective evidence rather than personal values, as seen in "The correlation between IQ and job performance increases as employees age, and the effect of experience reduces:" and "All causality leads to prediction, but not all prediction is causal." The pattern of setting up models, forecasting future trends, and insisting on structured conclusions reflects a judging orientation – e.g., "I attempted to forecast the economic trajectory of this century. Economic growth should continue as expected until 2050, with stagnation/decline potentially kicking in in the latter half." and "Need to polish out the numbers on this first but I'm pretty sure that retirement is going to become a luxury among zoomers."
Some pickup lines for you
- I’d love to co‑author a paper on our chemistry after your post about selecting employees for IQ—think we could publish a love study over coffee?
- Every time I hear the click of your DUROCK Ice King switches I imagine typing a message that says ‘Let’s debate politics and IQ while we game together’—care to test the theory?
- If we lived in an accelerationist timeline, I’d wirehead straight into your thoughts and skip the small talk—how about a date to see if reality feels as fast‑forwarded as our chats?
- Your new individualism‑collectivism index is impressive; how about we plot a personal index where my individualism meets your collectivism over a dinner?
- Reading The Last Psychiatrist made me realize I’m missing a diagnosis—‘swoon syndrome’ triggered by you; maybe a coffee can cure it before ZOG gets a chance to intervene.
Your 5 Emojis
Your new Twitter bio
Data‑driven analyst of IQ, economics & culture — once guessed NK’s IQ over espresso; also over‑estimated US elite IQ rates by forgetting to double the pop.– @jensenjeans
Your signature cocktail
The Selective Contrarian
The drink captures the analytical edge of a mind that says 'Creationism is wrong, and not all evolutionary theories are Darwinistic.' It also shows the contrarian flair of 'Zero to one is such a good book that the exact kind of people that Peter Thiel was dismissive of in his book started to ape his philosophy.' It blends bitter and bright notes, echoing the tweet 'All causality leads to prediction, but not all prediction is causal.' The smoky absinthe mirrors the tweet 'The sound of technofascism' while the espresso shot reflects the tweet 'I forgot to multiply the American population by 2 in this post, and I overestimated the % of >125 IQ people who attend elite universities by 2x as a result.'
Your Hogwarts House
Ravenclaw
The user consistently prioritizes knowledge and analytical thinking, as shown by a tweet that reads "Beliefs about IQ testing are suprisingly idiosyncratic. They don't vary much by politics, gender, or region," which highlights a data‑driven mindset. They also emphasize evidence‑based conclusions, for example "Selecting employees for IQ does work with caveats," indicating a focus on measurable outcomes. Their interest in the limits of intelligence testing is evident in "On a serious note, matrix reasoning is a mediocre test of intelligence," reflecting a scholarly critique. They frequently propose research ideas, such as "Study that needs to be done: the degree to which LLMs estimate the average IQs of individuals based on written text," showing curiosity and a love of learning. This sustained focus on learning, curiosity, and intellectual rigor aligns closely with Ravenclaw's values of wisdom and scholarship, rather than the bravery of Gryffindor, the loyalty of Hufflepuff, or the ambition of Slytherin.
Your movie
Your song
The Sound of Silence - Simon & Garfunkel
The user frequently laments that society ignores deeper, often uncomfortable truths, as seen in the tweet "The sound of technofascism" which riffs on the classic line "the sound of silence". Their recurring cynicism—e.g., "The fact that optimistic people tend to be smarter makes me less optimistic about humanity."—mirrors the song’s melancholy refrain "people hearing the sound of silence". They also stress that many discussions are superficial and lack real insight, exemplified by "All causality leads to prediction, but not all prediction is causal.", echoing the lyric "people talking without speaking". The overall mood of alienation and yearning for hidden knowledge fits their contrarian stance, as they often feel "I am done with you ZOG. I choose asceticism.". Thus the song’s themes of quiet dissent and the search for truth under a veneer of silence align closely with their tweet feed.
Your time travel destination
Your video game
Your spirit animal
Your (un)funny joke
Your superpower
Your fictional best friend
Your dream vacation
Your alternate career path
Your celebrity match
Did you enjoy your Horoscope?
Your horoscope is 68 days old! Generate a better one from your latest tweets, unlock more insights and use a smarter pro AI!
