Strengths and Weaknesses
Strengths:
- Fact‑oriented: Frequently cites studies and data to rebut claims, e.g. debunking divorce stats in “There is no existing study or evidence that has concluded the 90% divorce rate among college educated women” and sharing brain-scan research in “A new study published on November 25, 2025 with a sample size of over 4,000 brain scans”.
- Politically_engaged: Open about being a Democrat and engages with politics, e.g. critiquing conservatives in “This is how these conservative rightoids should be talked to” and commenting on JD Vance in “JD Vance changed his gender to look like Erika Kirk”.
- Protective_ally: Defends women and marginalized groups, e.g. calling out rape apologia in “I’m gonna read you to fucking filth you pathetic pedo supporter and rape apologist.” and challenging myths about lesbian IPV in “Lesbians have higher IPV rates at the hands of women DEBUNKED”.
- Analytical_communicator: Breaks topics into arguments and counterarguments, as in the detailed breakdown of body-count discourse in “Why 'Body count' Discourse from the loser Red Pill morons is Peak Hypocrisy” and the surgeon-performance thread in “Here are the facts about female surgeons”.
- Emotionally_expressive: Shares personal feelings and experiences, such as nostalgia about an old classmate in “Just met up with my old classmate I haven’t seen a decade and I felt so nostalgic.” and concern for a friend in Iran in “My Iranian friend of 10 years wasn’t able to reach me today because the Iranian government took down their Internet service.”.
Weaknesses:
- Hostile_language: Regularly uses insults like “subhumans,” “moids,” and “loser,” e.g. in “Moids are embittered, jealous subhumans.” and “All these used up 35+ moids with baggage”, which can alienate potential allies.
- Personal_attacks: Frequently targets individuals rather than only arguments, e.g. “You’re a loser in real life and in your own fantasies.” and “I know for a fact you are a 30+ year old post wall loser”.
- Dehumanizing_tone: Uses dehumanizing framing for men, such as “Women survive and protect better on their own; it is you, the men, who are in need of women, never the other way around.” and calling a group “subhuman population” in “I have come to the conclusion that every brain dead take about women on this site is all coming from angry post wall male third worlders”.
- Conflict_escalation: Often escalates arguments aggressively (e.g. threatening to “read you to fucking filth” in “I’m gonna read you to fucking filth you pathetic pedo supporter and rape apologist.” and mocking opponents’ mental state in “Uncle Charlie born in 1989 on his schizo rants again”), which can intensify online hostility.
- Generalizing_bias: Makes sweeping negative generalizations about men, e.g. “Men aren't doing shit, neither for their kids and wives nor their aging parents.” and “The rightoids sending in their best and brightest moidslops they have to offer”, which can undermine the nuance of her evidence-based points.
Your Simpsons character
Lisa Simpson
This user is most like Lisa Simpson: highly opinionated, data-driven, and moralistic, but also openly combative. They constantly invoke studies and statistics to debunk others, like when they write long evidence-heavy threads such as “🚨A new study published on November 25, 2025 with a sample size of over 4,000 brain scans shows four major topological turning points across the lifespan…” and “🚨Men do NOT peak later, that’s a myth and a cope made by old men like Rollo Tomassi because they’re undesired and angry. Here are studies:”. Like Lisa, they adopt a clear feminist, liberal, fact-checking identity — their bio literally says “Lover | Democrat | Fact Checker,” and they celebrate research-based corrections such as “There is no existing study or evidence that has concluded the 90% divorce rate among college educated women, none. This is another misogynistic lie that is not backed up by evidence.”. At the same time, their sharp, sometimes caustic tone toward “moids” and “rightoids,” for instance calling someone a “misogynist loser” in “Misogynist loser shakes at the keyboard because I told him women do not want men with a high bodycount.”, fits Lisa’s righteous anger when confronting injustice turned up to 11. Their mix of niche fandoms (anime, One Piece, Teen Titans) and political arguments, like “Hot and cannon take: Raven was the reason why Terra is alive.”, matches Lisa’s blend of intellectualism and passionate pop-culture interests. Overall, they resemble a more online, radicalized version of Lisa Simpson: idealistic, research-oriented, and relentless in calling out what they see as ignorance or misogyny.
Your MBTI personality Type
ENTJ
They present as clearly Extraverted: they actively seek public confrontation and interaction, frequently replying to and quote-tweeting others, e.g. calling out conservatives and misogynists in threads like “This is how these conservative rightoids should be talked to” and “I’m gonna read you to fucking filth you pathetic pedo supporter and rape apologist.”, showing comfort with high social visibility and conflict. Their focus is strongly Intuitive: they constantly generalize from individual disputes into broader patterns about gender, power, and society, as in “Women survive and protect better on their own; it is you, the men, who are in need of women, never the other way around.” and their long theory-heavy threads about paternal age, mtDNA, or body-count discourse like “🚨Men do NOT peak later, that’s a myth and a cope made by old men…”. They come off as Thinking over Feeling in decision style: even when highly emotional and insulting, they constantly lean on studies, statistics, and logical refutations to ‘destroy’ opponents, for example in “🚨 A common cope men like to use is that women want men with 'muh eXperIEncE,' but study after study shows…” and “There is no existing study or evidence that has concluded the 90% divorce rate among college educated women, none.”, prioritizing being factually right over harmony. Their style is strongly Judging: they prefer clear conclusions, categorical stances, and structured debunk threads, as seen in repeated “🚨” explanation posts like “🚨The false claim that men are better than women in survival based on a survival show is DEBUNKED!” and “🚨 Lesbians have higher IPV rates at the hands of women DEBUNKED w/Source Provided 🚨”, and they speak in firm moral verdicts such as “Women survive and protect better on their own… We only need you to have babies and do the jobs we don't want to do.”. Taken together—publicly combative, theory- and pattern-focused, argument- and evidence-driven, and decisive with strong judgments—these traits map best onto ENTJ rather than other NT types.
Some pickup lines for you
- You’re out here reading misogynists to filth with JSTOR in one hand and a bodycount study in the other—how about we design our own longitudinal study: effects of One (1) Girl Scout on One (1) liberal simp’s serotonin levels? 🧪
- You said Alabasta, then Water 7 and Enies Lobby are your favorite arcs—so if I tell you you’re literally my Miss Allllll Sunday AND my Robin beloved in one, is that enough to skip to the post–time skip where we’re already dating?
- You beating a Trump supporter at gambling over and over sounded fun, but I think the real high‑stakes game is me betting my heart that the woman who celebrates JeanKasa canon and Mikasa slander‑defense would also protect me from rightoids in the replies. 😆
- You: dismantling fake stats on lesbians, surgeons, and body counts with citations and brain‑scan papers. Me: quietly falling for the fact‑checker whose idea of romance might actually be sending PubMed links at 2 a.m.—can I be peer‑reviewed into your life?
- You said if women could get each other pregnant birth rates would skyrocket—sadly biology fumbled, but I’m very available as a donor male: younger than the post‑wall moids, low baggage, willing to take your last name, and fully committed to being your mtDNA’s biggest fan.
Your 5 Emojis
Your new Twitter bio
Data-obsessed feminist, Democrat, and anime enjoyer. Fact-checking rightoids for sport since I won my first political bet off a Trump supporter.– @MedaFact
Your signature cocktail
The Misogynist Molotov
Overproof dark rum is the base because their energy is strong, combative, and unfiltered, the same vibe as calling out “misogynist loser shakes at the keyboard” in “Misogynist loser shakes at the keyboard because I told him women do not want men with a high bodycount.”. Fresh lime juice adds sharp acidity, echoing the clean, factual edge in threads like “🚨Men do NOT peak later, that’s a myth and a cope made by old men like Rollo Tomassi because they’re undesired and angry.”. Spicy ginger beer embodies the constant fiery drag and humor in tweets such as “This is how these conservative rightoids should be talked to:” and “The rightoids sending in their best and brightest moidslops they have to offer, ainnit tru lads?”. A dash of Angostura bitters represents the bitterness toward predators and reactionaries that fuels lines like “I’m gonna read you to fucking filth you pathetic pedo supporter and rape apologist.” and “Look at his group of pedos called the PMC (Piss moid collective)….”. Blackberry syrup adds a dark, sweet depth underneath all the fire, nodding to softer moments like “Merry Christmas, everybody!🎄❤️ … I hope I win something.” and the nostalgia in “Just met up with my old classmate I haven’t seen a decade and I felt so nostalgic.”. This cocktail is strong, spicy, a bit bitter, and darkly sweet at the core—exactly like a fact-checking Girl Scout from the Soul Society hurling receipts and Molotovs at misogyny.
Your Hogwarts House
Gryffindor
Their timeline is dominated by confrontational moral stands and a willingness to charge directly into conflict, which strongly signals Gryffindor. They repeatedly and publicly call out people they see as dangerous or unethical, e.g. “I’m gonna read you to fucking filth you pathetic pedo supporter and rape apologist.” and “Look at his group of pedos called the PMC (Piss moid collective)… You guys support Jeffrey Epstein, want the age of consent to be 14…”, showing a classic bravery/justice crusader streak. They also display a readiness to jump into arguments with strong language and zero self‑protection, such as “LMFAOOOO I figured your tweet reeks of old man stench so lemme tell you this before I lose more brain cells…” and “Misogynist loser shakes at the keyboard because I told him women do not want men with a high bodycount.”, which fits Gryffindor impulsiveness more than the cold calculation of Slytherin. While they use a lot of data and studies, the way they deploy them is in service of bold, combative defense of women and marginalized groups, for instance “🚨 Lesbians have higher IPV rates at the hands of women DEBUNKED w/Source Provided 🚨”, again framed as a fight rather than detached analysis. Even their enjoyment of fictional conflict centers on strong, decisive female characters defeating oppressors—“I love seeing the misogynists cry after seeing their type of people getting brutally killed by a strong singular woman.”—which mirrors Gryffindor’s hero complex and identification with combat against perceived villains. Overall, the dominant traits are courage, outspokenness, and a readiness to enter the fray, making Gryffindor the best fit.
Your movie
Your song
Unknown - Unknown
Unable to determine.
Your time travel destination
Your video game
Your spirit animal
Your (un)funny joke
Your superpower
Your fictional best friend
Your dream vacation
Your alternate career path
Your celebrity match
Did you enjoy your Horoscope?
Your horoscope is 24 days old! Generate a better one from your latest tweets, unlock more insights and use a smarter pro AI!
