Strengths and Weaknesses
Strengths:
- Civically-engaged: Frequently discusses Australian politics, ACT policy and parties, e.g. critiques of Mark Parton and ACT Greens in “What makes mark Parton qualified, at this point he is just a tiktoker…” and “I dislike the federal greens but I kind of like the ACT greens…”.
- Analytical-thinker: Builds structured arguments on history and ideology, like “Worldview / historical view History is driven by economic conditions of the middle class…” and reflections after reading Socialism: Utopian and Scientific in “Just read the Introduction to socialism: utopian and scientific and I will read the rest…”.
- Policy-focused: Regularly proposes concrete policy ideas: garage/parking taxes in “There should be like a $500 fee per 5 square metres of garage or parking space…”, drug regulation in “The government should make and sell soft drugs to destroy the underground economy…”, and CSIRO funding in “Why won’t Labor just give CSIRO more money…”.
- Humorously-ironic: Uses self-aware and ironic jokes, e.g. “I’m now deeply suspicious of everyone on here who claims to be from Canberra, probably a bunch of immigrants…” and ACT expansion jokes in “We should set up east german style border checkpoints on the Queanbeyan border and extort them…”.
- Place-attached: Shows strong affection and knowledge of Canberra and specific suburbs, e.g. “If someone put a gun to my head and offered 1 million dollars for me to move away from Canberra. I would calmly stare down the barrel of the gun and refuse.” and detailed suburb preferences in “In Canberra:Griffith or Barton Sydney: Paddington, Balmain, Surry hills or Newtown…”.
Weaknesses:
- Harshly-judgmental: Often describes people in sweeping, contemptuous terms, e.g. “Anyone who is against technocracy as a concept is an idiot” and “Has like any communist or socialist writers considered not being German , British’s or Russians. Like I’m not sure I trust an ideology developed by those three”.
- Dehumanising-tone: Uses language that treats groups as expendable or parasitic, e.g. “If a hypothetical future government does deport people can we start with British and Irish influencers , real estate agents and people who work in marketing…” and “you’re a parasite on a economy and society if your wealth is in housing, I hope you lose all your money”.
- Provocation-reliant: Leans on edgy or shocking statements to make points, e.g. “Odds that he kills himself in less than two years now that he is writing articles” and “Non German Nazis have got to be the most embarrassing people ever… your a 36 year old balding man from Adelaide.”.
- Hostile-political: Political criticism often becomes personal attacks, as seen in the Mark Parton thread: “What makes mark Parton qualified, at this point he is just a tiktoker… All Parton is is a narcissist. Actual worst choice” and the follow-up regret in “Wrote like 1000 words on mark Parton… it just became personal attacks not about his policy and past”.
- Pessimistic-outlook: Expresses strong despair about future and society, e.g. “Why even try more than the bare minimum rent is like 45% of median wage housing is fucked climate is dying…” and “Watching new years on a MacBook in the dark… This is not my year”.
Your Simpsons character
Lisa Simpson
This user most closely matches Lisa Simpson: intensely political, bookish, idealistic, and a bit preachy, with a strong sense that policy and ideas actually matter. Like Lisa, they think in systems and institutions, praising technocracy and state capacity with takes such as “Anyone who is against technocracy as a concept is an idiot” and “I don’t get how anyone could ever be against the state and its spending… like everything good is because of the state”. They nerd out over foreign policy and ideology, e.g. “I really respect the French foreign policy position and how they have done the world post world war 2” and long threads like “Worldview / historical view… History is driven by economic conditions of the middle class…”, very Lisa-like intellectual monologuing. Their earnest concern for public goods, climate, and urbanism – for example “Why won’t Labor just give CSIRO more money… why is science always first on the chopping block” and “There should be like a $500 fee per 5 square metres of garage… to disincentivise driving and cars and incentivise better use of urban space” – mirrors Lisa’s activism. Even the slightly exasperated, world-weary tone about society and politics, like “Why even try more than the bare minimum… housing is fucked… climate is dying…”, feels exactly like Lisa’s mix of cynicism and stubborn hope.
Your MBTI personality Type
ENTJ
They lean Extraverted: they frequently broadcast strong opinions on politics and urbanism, openly attack public figures and groups (e.g. “You cannot vote for mark Parton he is a puppet of the Kiribati government”, “If someone put a gun to my head and offered 1 million dollars for me to move away from Canberra. I would calmly stare down the barrel of the gun and refuse.”), and seek discourse rather than privacy. Their focus is clearly Intuitive: they prefer big‑picture theorising about systems, history, and ideology, such as “History is driven by economic conditions of the middle class…” and speculative geopolitical takes like “Kazakhstan has immense potential for the future…”. They are strongly Thinking-oriented, arguing from structural logic and policy rather than harmony, even when it’s harsh: “I don’t care if housing reform crashes your finances, you’re a parasite on a economy and society if your wealth is in housing” and “Anyone who is against technocracy as a concept is an idiot”. Their tweets show a Judging preference: they constantly propose concrete reforms and institutional designs—taxing garages, nationalising papers, state‑run soft drugs, expanding brackets (e.g. “We should have more tax brackets in Australia”, “The government should make and sell soft drugs to destroy the underground economy…”)—and evaluate parties and leaders in terms of competence and long‑term strategy (“We wouldn’t have like 80% of the issues we face in Australia… if we just elected Bill shorten in 2019”). Altogether, this combination of outspoken engagement, abstract systemic thinking, blunt logical critique, and planning‑oriented policy focus best fits ENTJ.
Some pickup lines for you
- You said you’d calmly stare down the barrel of a gun rather than leave Canberra — bold offer, but what if the ultimatum was ‘leave Canberra or go on a date with me along the light rail complaining about Transport Canberra delays’? I promise I’m more reliable than the timetable.
- You once said watches are like the ‘semiconductors of the past’ — finely engineered, compact beauty. As a proud Canberran technocrat who spiritually vibes with Palantir, can I apply to be your favourite piece of high‑precision, state-sponsored hardware?
- You’re out here defending bike helmets, campaigning to tax garage space, and dreaming of dense terrace suburbs near trains and good bakeries. Are you an ACT urban plan? Because my long-term housing strategy is to be zoned R1: romantically adjacent to you.
- You called Bill Shorten your Trotsky and said we’d have dodged 80% of our problems if he’d won in 2019. I might not be Bill, but I’m very pro-state, mildly socdem, and absolutely in favour of nationalising your Friday nights so they’re publicly owned by the two of us.
- You ranked your neocon grid, wrote threads on Engels, praised France’s foreign policy, and declared the ACT the chosen land. If history is driven by the middle class, maybe we should meet in the middle: coffee at a proper non-Starbucks café where we can plan our statist, terrace-lined Canberra utopia together.
Your 5 Emojis
Your new Twitter bio
Canberra lifer, policy nerd & transit tragic. Once missed a bus by 40s and turned it into a manifesto on urban planning and the welfare state.– @milkysnail105
Your signature cocktail
The Canberra Technocrat Spritz
This drink starts with a eucalyptus–lemon myrtle gin base to honour their obsessive love of Canberra and the ACT, from calling it “Gods chosen land” to refusing to leave even for a million dollars (“If someone put a gun to my head and offered 1 million dollars for me to move away from Canberra. I would calmly stare down the barrel of the gun and refuse.”, “Canberra is Gods chosen land and everyone must take a pilgrimage there”). Dry vermouth adds a sharp, policy-wonk dryness for the guy who wants more tax brackets, taxes on garages, and massive state spending (“We should have more tax brackets in Australia”, “I don’t get how anyone could ever be against the state and its spending”). Green Chartreuse brings a herbal, ideological complexity for someone who simultaneously vibes with technocracy and Palantir, flirts with socialism, and ranks their own SocDem sliders (“Anyone who is against technocracy as a concept is an idiot”, “I get Palantir on a spiritual level”, “SocDem are you?”). Tonic water gives it a bitter-sweet, late-night doomscroll fizz to match their posts about housing being cooked, climate anxiety, and the feeling that “Why even try more than the bare minimum” (“Why even try more than the bare minimum”, “How is anyone meant to afford a walkable neighbourhood in Australia”). Finally, a grapefruit peel garnish adds a bright, zesty top note for their oddly optimistic, shitposting energy—someone who will happily nationalise soft drugs, revive sleeper trains, and tax garages into oblivion while still saying “Happy new year” to the timeline (“The government should make and sell soft drugs to destroy the underground economy”, “The people yearn for sleeper trains”, “Happy new year”).
Your Hogwarts House
Ravenclaw
Their timeline is defined by analysis, theory, and intellectual curiosity more than by sentiment or raw ambition. They frequently engage with political and economic theory, e.g. long-form threads like “Worldview / historical view History is driven by economic conditions of the middle class…” and reflections on Engels and Marx such as “Just read the Introduction to socialism: utopian and scientific and I will read the rest over the next day or so But I have thoughts 1/6”, showing a love of learning and structured thinking. They also show a strong technocratic, systems-focused mindset in tweets like “Anyone who is against technocracy as a concept is an idiot” and “Why won’t Labor just give CSIRO more money… if you fund science we will get breakthroughs that help our climate and economy”, which is classic Ravenclaw rationalism. Even their urbanism and policy takes are analytical rather than purely moralistic, proposing mechanisms like “There should be like a $500 fee per 5 square metres of garage or parking space in dense areas… to disincentivise driving and cars and incentivise better use of urban space.” and “We should have more tax brackets in Australia”. While they have some Slytherin-adjacent edge and local-nationalist pride, as in “Yes I’m a blood and soil nationalist for the ACT”, the dominant pattern is cerebral, theory-driven, and fascinated by structures and institutions, making Ravenclaw the best fit.
Your movie
Your song
Common People - Pulp
The best-fitting song for @milkysnail105 is Common People by Pulp, with its mix of class consciousness, urban obsession, and dry sarcasm. They constantly rail against housing inequality and landlordism, e.g. “I don’t care if housing reform crashes your finances, you’re a parasite on a economy and society if your wealth is in housing, I hope you lose all your money”, which mirrors the song’s contempt for those who treat inequality as an aesthetic. Their fixation on walkable, dense, terrace-lined cities like “I see pictures of terraces and you just have to think were did we go wrong as a society for us to stop building suburbs like this and instead build hell on earth in the form of McMansion suburbs” and “How is anyone meant to afford a walkable neighbourhood in Australia” fits perfectly with the song’s imagery of cramped, vivid city life. There’s also their ironic local patriotism and class-aware nationalism, from “If someone put a gun to my head and offered 1 million dollars for me to move away from Canberra. I would calmly stare down the barrel of the gun and refuse” to “The working class in Australia aspires to be petite bourgeois, truely the only workers left are the public service, doctors , urban planners and teachers”, echoing the song’s critique of class aspiration and authenticity. The blend of political frustration, sardonic humour, and love for everyday urban life makes Common People a strong thematic match.
Your time travel destination
Your video game
Your spirit animal
Your (un)funny joke
Your superpower
Your fictional best friend
Your dream vacation
Your alternate career path
Your celebrity match
Did you enjoy your Horoscope?
Your horoscope is 23 days old! Generate a better one from your latest tweets, unlock more insights and use a smarter pro AI!
