
Strengths and Weaknesses

Your Simpsons character
This user most closely resembles Lisa Simpson: politically engaged, analytical, and constantly trying to raise the level of public debate. Like Lisa, they dig into structural issues and power networks, for instance exposing influence and corruption in media and politics through threads such as “Faenón en la Franja: partido de Miguel del Castillo le dio 464 mil soles al canal de Miguel del Castillo” and “URGENTE: disolvieron a todos los Equipos Especiales: Lava Jato, Cuellos Blancos, Eficopp... hasta el que investigaba las masacres”. There’s a strong sense of civic duty and defense of institutions, visible when they highlight threats to press freedom, like “alerta del Comité para la Protección de Periodistas” and call out politicians’ conflicts of interest in tweets such as “Williams da entrevistas como candidato EN SU DESPACHO DEL CONGRESO”. The account also shows Lisa-like intellectualism and cultural references, from quoting Isaac Asimov in “«Existe un culto a la ignorancia...»” to nerding out about comics with “qué gran GRAN serie fue Gotham Central”. At the same time, there’s dry, sometimes sarcastic humor in lines like “no prendan cohetes, basuras” and “la teoría de que todos en Internet tienen 12 años más vigente que nunca en estos días”, which fits Lisa’s mix of moral seriousness and exasperated wit in a world that often refuses to listen.

Your MBTI personality Type
They present as an Extrovert (E): their feed is highly outward-facing, full of interviews, public appearances, and direct engagement with politicians and audiences, for example inviting people to watch shows like “no se la pierdan” and repeatedly thanking candidates for interviews such as “gracias al candidato @BelaundeRafael por aceptar la invitación de #CalateoElectoral”. Their focus is clearly Intuitive (N), zooming out to systems, geopolitics, and patterns rather than just isolated facts, as in “Perú es clave: los EE.UU. calientan la guerra fría contra China por el mar peruano” and the way they connect illegal mining, China, and political clans in “en el lavado de la minería ilegal tambieeeeeén aparece la sombra de China. y el regreso del clan Sánchez Paredes”. Their reasoning style is strongly Thinking (T): they dissect political maneuvers and corruption using evidence-based, sometimes cutting analysis rather than conciliatory language, as seen in “Faenón en la Franja: partido de Miguel del Castillo le dio 464 mil soles al canal de Miguel del Castillo” and the sarcastic critique of anti‑intellectualism around Asimov’s quote in “Existe un culto a la ignorancia…“. Finally, they read as strongly Judging (J), with a structured, investigative, and agenda‑driven approach—constantly running serialized exposés like “DESTAPE: el voceado próximo jefe de la SUNEDU ya tiene instalada allí su argolla de abogados de ‘Lima Sur’” and framing political issues as things to be systematically unpacked, such as “las elecciones ni siquiera han empezado de verdad y el JNE ya está en el centro de DOS polémicas”. Taken together—public-facing, big-picture, logic-focused, and highly organized in campaigns and investigations—this profile best matches ENTJ.

Some pickup lines for you

Your 5 Emojis
Your new Twitter bio
Journalist dissecting Peruvian power games on La Encerrona & Canal YA. Once fact-checked a president mid-speech and slept like a baby after.– @ocram

Your signature cocktail
A mix of smoky mezcal and Peruvian pisco channels his investigations into murky power games and Peruvian politics, like when he dives into US–China tensions over the Pacific in “Perú es clave: los EE.UU. calientan la guerra fría contra China por el mar peruano” and the shadowy networks in “ESPECIAL con todos los caramelitos chinos de @josejeriore”. The cold‑brew coffee is for his relentless, caffeinated scrutiny of candidates and scandals, from “Faenón en la Franja: partido de Miguel del Castillo le dio 464 mil soles al canal de Miguel del Castillo” to “EXCLUSIVO: los congresistas que más se enriquecieron en estos cinco años”. A dash of Amaro adds bitterness to match his acid humor when he mocks political absurdity in “JAJAJAJAJA si Acuña no existiera, lo habría inventado Shakespeare” and the “moralistas” in “amo las comillas burlonas en “moralistas de derecha””. Finally, the ginger beer fizz represents his sharp, punchy delivery and playful side, like the snark of “no prendan cohetes, basuras” and the self‑aware line “el programa no se llama “difusión”. se llama La Encerrona”. Strong, slightly bitter, and refreshingly incendiary, it’s a drink that, like his feed, keeps you awake, a bit angry, and very entertained.

Your Hogwarts House
Marco consistently shows bravery and confrontation of power, a core Gryffindor trait. He publicly challenges powerful politicians and institutions, for example when he calls out a congresswoman for a self‑benefiting law in “ojo @MJAguayo63 dio una ley que beneficiaba “refugios” como el suyo aquí 👇🏽👇🏽👇🏽” and when he denounces the disbanding of anti‑corruption teams as a “regalo de Reyes para el Pacto” in “URGENTE: disolvieron a todos los Equipos Especiales… regalo de Reyes para el Pacto”. He keeps reporting on sensitive cases that put him at odds with powerful actors, such as investigating Chinese business influence and high‑level political corruption in “ESPECIAL con todos los caramelitos chinos de @josejeriore…” and “red de prostitución del Congreso: el vínculo de la familia de Pepe Luna con la chica asesinada”, which reflects moral courage more than self‑preservation. He also confronts those who legally pressure him, openly discussing a defamation case against him in “junto a su abogado… insiste en llevar nada menos que a la Corte Suprema una querella por difamación en mi contra.”, instead of backing down. While his wit and analysis could fit Ravenclaw, his defining features are his willingness to take risks, speak bluntly, and stand up against abuse of power, aligning most strongly with Gryffindor.

Your movie

Your song
A combative, anti-corruption anthem like Killing in the Name fits a journalist who constantly calls out power structures and political abuses. They expose shady uses of public money in political advertising, like the "Faenón en la Franja" where a party pays its own channel, highlighted in “Faenón en la Franja: partido de Miguel del Castillo le dio 464 mil soles al canal de Miguel del Castillo”. They confront state overreach and impunity, for instance denouncing that “URGENTE: disolvieron a todos los Equipos Especiales... regalo de Reyes para el Pacto”. The song’s fury against institutional hypocrisy mirrors their tone when they note that a congresswoman and her lawyer are taking a defamation case to the Supreme Court in “insiste en llevar nada menos que a la Corte Suprema una querella por difamación en mi contra”. Even in global issues, they highlight the cynical monetization of catastrophe, as in “la monetización del apocalipsis”, which aligns with the song’s condemnation of systems that profit from injustice.

Your time travel destination

Your video game

Your spirit animal

Your (un)funny joke

Your superpower

Your fictional best friend

Your dream vacation

Your alternate career path

Your celebrity match

Did you enjoy your Horoscope?
Your horoscope is 8 days old! Generate a better one from your latest tweets, unlock more insights and use a smarter pro AI!
ocram
green: confident, yellow: guess, red: uncertain
Inactive followers? Check yours!
Fake/Bot followers? Check yours!
sponsored by Circleboom