
Strengths and Weaknesses

Your Simpsons character
The user most closely matches Comic Book Guy: highly opinionated, technically literate, and sharply critical of perceived incompetence. Their disdain for AI hype and "AI bros" mirrors his sarcastic gatekeeping, as in "I swear these AI bros are mental. All of them." and "Don't rely on AI for anything, really. I hope it flops soon.". Like Comic Book Guy nitpicking every detail, they focus on technical correctness and quality, calling out Python pitfalls in "The operator 'is' is not a value equality test, it's object identity." and UI flaws in "A multi billion dollar company pushed this to production. Buttons have different height...". Their world-weary, somewhat misanthropic tone in "If I were asked by an alien race to describe humankind in just a single word, that would have been 'hypocrisy'." also matches his cynical outlook. Even their jokes about "prompt 'Engineers'" as a kind of techno-cult in "Prompt 'Engineers' are like Adeptus Mechanicus." echo Comic Book Guy's nerd-culture references and superiority complex.

Your MBTI personality Type
They lean toward Introversion (I): their tweets focus on observations and critiques rather than socializing or sharing personal life, and the tone is detached and self-contained, e.g. analyzing GitHub’s UI in “A multi billion dollar company pushed this to production. Buttons have different height, some have vertical separator for dropdown trigger, some don't.”. There is a strong Intuitive (N) bent in how they generalize from specifics to broader patterns, such as summarizing humanity as “If I were asked by an alien race to describe humankind in just a single word, that would have been 'hypocrisy'.” and mocking “vibe coding” as a cultural/technological trend in “Vibe coding is when you buy a $300 LLM, ask it, 'Write me a SaaS to make $10k/mo,' and hype.”. Their style is clearly Thinking (T): they prioritize logic, technical accuracy, and critique over harmony, as in “You get what you're asking for. The operator “is” is not a value equality test, it's object identity.” and the sharp dismissal of AI users in “LMAO, AI “programmers” struggle with config being split into several files.”. Finally, they read as Judging (J): they have strong, structured opinions on how things should be done (performance, UI consistency, realistic hardware claims), shown in “Performance is important. On so many levels.” and in their standards-driven criticism like “Saying that the #Steam machine is 'powerful' and targets 4K@60 is wishful thinking at best…”. Putting these together, the pattern of abstract critique, technical rigor, and systematizing judgments best fits INTJ.

Some pickup lines for you

Your 5 Emojis

Your new Twitter bio
Frontend dev, performance snob, AI skeptic. Once filed a bug report on a billion‑dollar UI and couldn’t unsee misaligned buttons ever again.– @sotona

Your signature cocktail
This drink starts with high-proof Georgian chacha, a nod to their Batumi roots and sharp, uncompromising takes like “If I were asked by an alien race to describe humankind in just a single word, that would have been 'hypocrisy'.”. Cold brew coffee concentrate fuels the late-night dev energy behind rants about performance and code, such as “Performance is important. On so many levels.”. A dry Italian amaro brings a bitter, complex edge that mirrors their disdain for sloppy AI hype and “prompt engineers,” seen in zingers like “Prompt 'Engineers' are like Adeptus Mechanicus.” and “Vibe coding is when you buy a $300 LLM... and it deletes the whole project.”. The dash of saline solution represents the salty sarcasm in lines like “LMAO, AI ‘programmers’ struggle with config being split into several files.”. Finally, burnt sugar syrup with a lemon twist adds charred sweetness and acidity, capturing how their criticism of big tech and tooling—like “A multi billion dollar company pushed this to production.” and “@rustlang is a new JavaScript, lol.”—still comes with style, wit, and a sharp little citrus sting at the end.

Your Hogwarts House
This user consistently displays analytical thinking, technical precision, and a clear value for understanding how things really work, all of which point strongly to Ravenclaw. They correct misconceptions in detail, like explaining Python’s is operator and CPython integer caching in “You get what you're asking for. The operator “is” is not a value equality test, it's object identity. Also, this particular case is CPython implementation detail (it caches objects for numbers in the range [ 5, 256]) and is not guaranteed.”, which shows a love of exact knowledge and teaching. Their frustration with sloppy engineering and design — for example calling out GitHub’s inconsistent button UI in “A multi billion dollar company pushed this to production. Buttons have different height, some have vertical separator for dropdown trigger, some don't. Paddings between button elements are inconsistent.” and mocking hypey 'neuro slop' projects in “> commercial > production ready > days > $47/hr > neuro slop What could go wrong?” — reflects a cerebral, standards-driven mindset. Their jokes are also conceptually sharp, like comparing prompt engineers to Adeptus Mechanicus in “Prompt 'Engineers' are like Adeptus Mechanicus. They believe that if they use specific wording and add 'do not lie' at the end, the Machine Spirit will listen.”, which shows wit and layered cultural knowledge. Even when criticizing AI, it’s from a reasoned, engineering-focused perspective, as in “Installing @TauriApps CLI and trunk (dependency to bundle Wasm) requires downloading and installing a whopping 1200 dependencies combined. @rustlang is a new JavaScript, lol.” and “Every time I see devs claim that users aren't concerned about performance and that you can just purchase more computing power, I feel the most cringe possible in software development. Performance is important. On so many levels.”, which emphasizes thoughtful evaluation over blind hype. The overall pattern is not about ambition (Slytherin) or warmth and loyalty (Hufflepuff), but about insight, critique, and intellectual rigor, making Ravenclaw the best fit.

Your movie

Your song
A fitting song for @sotona is Boulevard of Broken Dreams by Green Day, as it captures a mix of cynicism, disillusionment, and walking a solitary path. They show clear frustration with modern tech culture and AI hype, e.g. “Vibe coding is when you buy a $300 LLM, ask it, 'Write me a SaaS to make $10k/mo,' and hype.” and “Don't rely on AI for anything, really. I hope it flops soon.”, echoing the song’s theme of disappointment in the world around them. Their broader view of humanity is bleak and sardonic, as in “If I were asked by an alien race to describe humankind in just a single word, that would have been 'hypocrisy'.”, which fits the song’s lonely, alienated perspective. At the same time, they clearly care about craft and standards—complaining about UI/UX and performance like in “Every time I see devs claim that users aren't concerned about performance ... I feel the most cringe possible in software development.”—suggesting someone walking their own road despite widespread mediocrity. That combination of principled isolation, critical eye, and disillusioned tone aligns well with the emotional landscape of Boulevard of Broken Dreams.

Your time travel destination

Your video game

Your spirit animal

Your (un)funny joke

Your superpower

Your fictional best friend

Your dream vacation

Your alternate career path

Your celebrity match

Did you enjoy your Horoscope?
Your horoscope is 23 days old! Generate a better one from your latest tweets, unlock more insights and use a smarter pro AI!

sotona
green: confident, yellow: guess, red: uncertain
Inactive followers? Check yours!
Fake/Bot followers? Check yours!
sponsored by Circleboom