优点和缺点
优点：
- 热情积极: 多条推文用“Stoked!”、“Superb opportunity!”、“Fantastic news and an awesome opportunity!”等兴奋语气，整体情绪高昂、传递正向能量。
- 学术专注: 多次强调动机与刑法责任，如演讲题目“The Unity of Motive”“Untangling the Gordian Knot of Motive”，以及写作动机与刑事责任的短文，体现稳定而清晰的研究方向。
- 善于合作: 多次提到与@kneer 的合作论文和在会议上共同展示成果，并公开感谢他人，如赞扬他人工作“ Incredible work, well done everyone!”等。
- 沟通友好: 演讲推文中主动邀请交流，例如“Come say hi if you're around”“do say hi if you'd like to talk about intentions, motives, and the law!”，语气亲切开放。
- 科普导向: 推文中推荐CJT Blog 的文章“super accessible”，并用简短🧵解释论文成果，表明有把复杂理论向大众解释的动机。
缺点：
- 内容单一: 时间线几乎全部是学术会议、论文和机会相关内容，极少涉及生活、社会或其他兴趣，整体主题较窄，易显刻板。
- 信息稀薄: 多条推文只写“Stoked!”“This looks incredibly exciting!”配图或引用，而缺乏对活动内容、观点或收获的具体说明。
- 自我推广偏重: 频繁发布自己要“give a paper”“give a talk”、新论文出炉和自己写的文章，少见对他人作品的深入讨论，容易给人以自我宣传偏多的印象。
- 论点不展: 如在关于因果判断与偏见的🧵和规范违反与因果性的🧵中，仅用简短句子引出问题，但在推特正文中不展开关键结论，降低说服力。
- 受众局限: 大量使用如“#CogSci2023”“@socphilpsych”这类会议标签与术语，对圈外读者不加解释，可能限制非学术受众的理解和参与。
你的辛普森角色
Lisa Simpson
从简介里看，他是伦敦的刑法哲学博士生，关注动机、因果与法律等抽象问题，这种学术型、热爱思考的气质非常像 Lisa Simpson。例如他发推说自己要在牛津研究生哲学会议上宣读题为 The Unity of Motive 的论文：“I'll be giving 📢 a paper titled 'The Unity of Motive' at the 27th Oxford Graduate Conference in Philosophy this Sunday!”，以及在 CJT Blog 发表关于动机与刑事责任的小文：“Wrote a little piece on motive and criminal liability. 😇 Also, I highly recommend checking out the CJT Blog more generally…”，都体现出她式的“学术早熟”和对正义问题的兴趣。又比如他与合作者研究常人因果判断偏误与规范违背的关系：“Our #CogSci2023 paper is finally out! 🎉 In it, @kneer and I present experimental evidence for the claim that ordinary causal judgement… falls prey to biases.” 和 “Courts hold that causation is 'to be understood as the man in the street, not as the scientist or metaphysician would understand it.' In a new paper with @kneer, we explore the folk concept of causation and highlight potential pitfalls.”，这种把哲学、心理学和法律结合起来、反思“普通人观念”的做法，也很符合 Lisa 爱用理性和科学来检验社会与制度的个性。此外，他在多条推文中表现出真诚的热情与鼓励他人的语气，如 “Fantastic news and an awesome opportunity!” 和 “Incredible work, well done everyone!”，这和 Lisa 既严肃又温暖、支持同伴的性格十分契合。
你的 MBTI 性格类型
ENTJ
从这些推文来看，他更像是**外向型（E）而非内向型：多次公开邀请他人来听报告，比如“I'll be giving 📢 a paper titled 'The Unity of Motive' at the 27th Oxford Graduate Conference in Philosophy this Sunday! Come say hi if you're around 😇”，以及“I'll be giving a talk 📢 titled 'Untangling the Gordian Knot of Motive' … do say hi if you'd like to talk about intentions, motives, and the law! 😇”，明显享受与他人互动和曝光机会。内容上，他高度关注抽象理论、概念分析与“动机”“因果”“规范”等问题，而不是日常琐事或感官体验，例如“Our #CogSci2023 paper is finally out! 🎉 In it, @kneer and I present experimental evidence for the claim that ordinary causal judgement, especially in the context of norm violations, falls prey to biases.”以及“Courts hold that causation is 'to be understood as the man in the street, not as the scientist or metaphysician would understand it.' In a new paper with @kneer, we explore the folk concept of causation and highlight potential pitfalls.”，这都符合直觉型（N）**偏好。 他在推文中主要以理性分析、学术成果和论证为核心，例如围绕“民众因果概念的偏差”“规范违反对因果判断的影响”“动机与刑事责任”的讨论，而不是诉诸情绪或个人感受，这非常符合思考型（T）而非情感型的风格，如“Why do we deem norm violating agents as more causal than their non norm violating counterparts? And what are the legal implications? Presented joint work with @kneer at @socphilpsych in Milano.”。同时，他频繁发布关于已经安排好的会议报告、论文发表、博客文章等高度结构化的职业规划信息，如“I'll be giving 📢 a paper titled 'The Unity of Motive' …”和“Our #CogSci2023 paper is finally out! 🎉 … A short 🧵. [1/9]”，再加上对“short thread”“1/9、1/12”这种系统化呈现信息的偏好，显示出明显的判断型（J）特征。综合这些迹象——外向的学术社交、抽象理论导向、以逻辑和证据为核心的表达方式，以及重视结构和规划的职业节奏——最匹配的MBTI类型是ENTJ。
一些为你准备的搭讪台词
- 听说你在牛津讲《The Unity of Motive》——那今晚要不要再测试一个假说：约会的“动机统一”，是不是足以“因果解释”我们一起喝一杯？
- 你老在推上开🧵说『norm‑violating agents 被看作更有因果力』——那我如果大胆一点违规，直接约你喝咖啡，是不是就能显著提升我在你心里的“因果贡献度”？
- 你在 Causation 那篇和 @kneer 的实验里研究大众的因果判断；要不要换个实验设计：我们一起散步，你来判断，是伦敦的夜色导致我心动，还是你这个 criminal jurisprudence PhD 的微笑造成了全部结果？
- 你说在 CJT Blog 上写了小短文，还『继续从中获益良多』——那我能不能也贡献一篇：〈动机、刑责与暗恋：为何不断刷 @levinguever 的时间线，构成了一种无法辩护的“精神占有”？〉
- 你每次发『Stoked!』『Superb opportunity!』『Really looking forward to this!』都配图、配会议信息——等哪天你发一条：『Going on a date in London – really looking forward to this!』的时候，能不能让我当那条推文里的“quoted tweet”？
你的 5 个表情符号
你的新 Twitter 简介
伦敦刑法哲学博士生｜研究动机与因果、公理与偏见｜曾在牛津报告“动机统一说”，也在咖啡店向路人解释因果责任– @levinguever
你的招牌鸡尾酒
动机一体·因果高球
这款动机一体·因果高球是一杯带点学术锋芒的清爽金酒高球：基酒选用伦敦干金酒，呼应他坐标伦敦与法律哲学的干练理性，又对应他在“Courts hold that causation is 'to be understood as the man in the street, not as the scientist or metaphysician would understand it.' In a new paper with @kneer, we explore the folk concept of causation and highlight potential pitfalls. Link: [1/12]”中对“街头人”的因果概念兴趣。接骨木花利口酒带来微甜与花香，好比他在“This will be a lot of fun! 😇 [picture] [quoted tweet]”和“Really looking forward to this! [picture] [quoted tweet]”中流露出的乐观与兴奋感。几滴橙味苦精象征他对规范违背与因果偏见的敏锐洞察，如“Our #CogSci2023 paper is finally out! 🎉 In it, @kneer and I present experimental evidence for the claim that ordinary causal judgement, especially in the context of norm violations, falls prey to biases. A short 🧵. [1/9]”和“Why do we deem norm violating agents as more causal than their non norm violating counterparts? And what are the legal implications? Presented joint work with @kneer at @socphilpsych in Milano. Link to poster: Short 🧵 below. 1/9”。苏打水让整体偏轻盈、易入口，反映他常说“Stoked!”、“Superb opportunity!”、“Fantastic news”那种社交与学术活动满档却仍保持清爽的能量。最后的柠檬皮扭纹既为因果“转折”与动机“纠结”的象征，也向他关于“I'll be giving 📢 a paper titled 'The Unity of Motive' at the 27th Oxford Graduate Conference in Philosophy this Sunday! Come say hi if you're around 😇”和“I'll be giving a talk 📢 titled 'Untangling the Gordian Knot of Motive' at the #JointSession of the Aristotelian Society and Mind Association tomorrow.”的研究致意。
你的霍格沃茨学院
Ravenclaw
从简介和推文来看，他是典型的 Ravenclaw。简介里自称是“PhD student @UCL working on criminal jurisprudence”，再加上多次围绕动机、因果与刑法理论的发言，显示出对抽象问题和理论细节的强烈兴趣，例如他发文介绍自己在牛津研究生会议上报告《The Unity of Motive》："I'll be giving 📢 a paper titled 'The Unity of Motive' at the 27th Oxford Graduate Conference in Philosophy this Sunday! Come say hi if you're around 😇 [picture]"。他不仅做理论，还非常重视实验和认知科学证据，在一篇与合作者的论文中写到普通人的因果判断会受偏误影响："Our #CogSci2023 paper is finally out! 🎉 In it, @kneer and I present experimental evidence for the claim that ordinary causal judgement, especially in the context of norm violations, falls prey to biases. A short 🧵. [1/9] [picture] [link to https://philpapers.org/rec/GVECFA]"。此外，他不断在不同学术场合报告关于因果与规范的工作，比如："Courts hold that causation is 'to be understood as the man in the street, not as the scientist or metaphysician would understand it.' In a new paper with @kneer, we explore the folk concept of causation and highlight potential pitfalls. Link: [1/12] [picture] [link to http://bit.ly/sillynorm]" 与 "Why do we deem norm violating agents as more causal than their non norm violating counterparts? And what are the legal implications? Presented joint work with @kneer at @socphilpsych in Milano. Link to poster: Short 🧵 below. 1/9 [picture] [link to http://bit.ly/foreseeability]"。这些都体现出他以好奇心驱动、热爱学习与分析、乐于在跨学科边界上琢磨问题，这些特质与 Ravenclaw 的求知欲与理性气质高度契合。
你的电影
你的歌曲
Don’t Stop Me Now - Queen
从推文和简介来看，Levin Güver 既是专注的法律哲学研究者，又有非常积极、兴奋的气质，因此最适合他的歌曲是 Don’t Stop Me Now。他常用“Stoked!”、“Superb opportunity!”、“This will be a lot of fun!”等语气，比如在一条推文中写道“This will be a lot of fun! 😇 [picture] [quoted tweet]”，这种持续高涨的热情和歌曲中“I'm having such a good time, I'm having a ball”的情绪非常契合。作为研究“motive”和因果判断的法哲学博士生，他在推文中提到“Wrote a little piece on motive and criminal liability. 😇 Also, I highly recommend checking out the CJT Blog more generally…”，展现出持续向前钻研与分享的动能，对应歌曲里那种势不可挡的前进感。他多次兴奋地宣传自己的报告，如“I'll be giving 📢 a paper titled 'The Unity of Motive' at the 27th Oxford Graduate Conference in Philosophy this Sunday!”和“I'll be giving a talk 📢 titled 'Untangling the Gordian Knot of Motive' at the #JointSession…”，仿佛在说“don’t stop me now，我正全速前进”。再加上他和合作者发表新论文时的兴奋语气，比如“Our #CogSci2023 paper is finally out! 🎉 … A short 🧵. [1/9]”，整体给人的感觉就是一位在学术路上高速奔跑、充满乐观与动力的人，与这首歌轻快而不可阻挡的节奏高度吻合。
你的时间旅行目的地
你的电子游戏
你的灵魂动物
你的（不）好笑的笑话
你的超能力
你的虚构最佳朋友
你的梦想假期
你的备选职业道路
你的名人匹配
